Linearly dependent numbers over the rationals

  • Thread starter Thread starter kyryk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linearly Numbers
kyryk
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi,
Assume that the real positive numbers x_1,x_2,...,x_n are linearly dependent over the rational numbers, i.e. there are q_1,...,q_n in Q such that x_1*q_1+...+x_n*q_n=0. Is there an algorithm to calculate the coefficients q_i? Is there an algorithm to even check if the x_i's are linearly dependent over Q? In a finite dimensional space, we have the Gauss elimination algorithm, is there something similar?

For example, if we only have two numbers x and y, both >0, then we can start subtracting the smaller one from the larger one. This process terminates until one of them is zero, and that happens in a finite amount of steps if and only if their ratio is a rational number.
Is there anything similar to this for more than two numbers?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
kyryk said:
Hi,
Assume that the real positive numbers x_1,x_2,...,x_n are linearly dependent over the rational numbers, i.e. there are q_1,...,q_n in Q such that x_1*q_1+...+x_n*q_n=0.
This is incorrect. If the numbers x1, x2, ..., xn are linearly dependent, there are numbers q1, q2, ..., qn, not all of which are zero[/color], for which x1q1 + x2q2 + ... + xnqn = 0.
kyryk said:
Is there an algorithm to calculate the coefficients q_i? Is there an algorithm to even check if the x_i's are linearly dependent over Q? In a finite dimensional space, we have the Gauss elimination algorithm, is there something similar?

For example, if we only have two numbers x and y, both >0, then we can start subtracting the smaller one from the larger one. This process terminates until one of them is zero, and that happens in a finite amount of steps if and only if their ratio is a rational number.
Is there anything similar to this for more than two numbers?
 
Sure, it is part of the definition of linearly dependent, thanks for clarifying it though.

However, I still need an answer/suggestions to my actual question.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top