Understanding Lissajous Curves for Fourier Synthesis

AI Thread Summary
Fourier synthesis is being used to recreate a shape represented by spatial data in the x and y directions, initially resulting in an ellipse. The data's FFT reveals fundamental frequencies and harmonics, leading to the formulation of X(t) and Y(t) using cosine and sine functions. However, plotting these functions results in a Lissajous curve instead of the desired shape. The user seeks guidance on how to adjust the plotting of cosine and sine to accurately recreate the original elliptical shape. Further insights or rewording suggestions for clarity are requested.
Sam Smith
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
i have a question about Fourier synthesis and how this relates to lissajous curves.

I have two sets of test data; spatial data in the x and y directions. When I plot the x data against the y I get an ellipse. ( it represents a wing moving in a circular motion)

I am trying to recreate this shape by means of Fourier synthesis. To do this I look at the fft of my x and y data and get information about the amplitudes of the fundamental frequencies along with harmonics presents in both data sets. The real part I use as the coefficient of my cos and the imaginary as the coefficient of my sin.

And so I say

X(t) = a1* cos(2*pi*f*t) + b1* sin( 2*pi*f*t)

And

Y(t) = aa1* cos(2*pi*f*t) + bb1*sin( 2*pi*f*t) + aa2* cos(4*pi*f*t) + bb2*sin( 4*pi*f*t)

(There was just one peak in the x data and two peaks in the y)

However when I then plot x against y I get a lissajous curve. As I would expect as I am plotting sine waves against sin waves. How can I recreate the original shape? Must I somehow plot cos and sin differently?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Thanks for the post! Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top