Little issue with relativistic quantum mechanics

StephvsEinst
Science Advisor
Messages
41
Reaction score
1
Hey!

I was working with Dirac's equation:
$$ ( i \hbar \gamma^\mu \partial_\mu - m ) \psi = 0, $$
and I found that if you work with a function that depends on the momentum, $$ \psi ( \mathbf{p} ), $$ you obtain:
$$ ( i \gamma \cdot \mathbf{p} + m ) \psi ( \mathbf{p} ) = 0. $$
The problem is that I can't figure out how did the imaginary number not disappear in the last equation. I tried to work with $$ p_\mu \rightarrow i \hbar \partial_\mu , $$
and I obtained the following:
$$ ( \gamma \cdot \mathbf{p} + m ) \psi ( \mathbf{p} ) = 0. $$
Help?
$$ --- $$
The $$ \gamma $$ are the Gell-Mann marices.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The i is not there in the momentum space version of the Dirac equation. Wherever you took this from has a typo.
 
Orodruin said:
The i is not there in the momentum space version of the Dirac equation. Wherever you took this from has a typo.

Thanks for the answer. So I did it correctly?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top