Local Continuity and Restriction

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bacle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuity Local
Bacle
Messages
656
Reaction score
1
Hi,

Let f :X-->Y ; X,Y topological spaces is any map and {Ui: i in I} is a cover for X
so that :

f|_Ui is continuous, i.e., the restriction of f to each Ui is continuous, then:

1) If I is finite , and the {Ui} are all open (all closed) , we can show f is continuous:

taking W open in Y, f^-1(W)= \/ f^-1(W /\ Ui) = is the union of open sets in X;

each W/\Ui is open, and W/\Ui is contained in Ui.

( where \/ is the union over I ; /\ is intersection over I ); same for V closed in Y.


2) If I is infinite, the argument can break down , i.e., if {Ui } is a closed cover

for X (each Ui is closed) ; f|_Ui is continuous and I is infinite, then this result

fails. Does anyone know of an example of this last?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bacle said:
Hi,

Let f :X-->Y ; X,Y topological spaces is any map and {Ui: i in I} is a cover for X
so that :

f|_Ui is continuous, i.e., the restriction of f to each Ui is continuous, then:

1) If I is finite , and the {Ui} are all open (all closed) , we can show f is continuous:

taking W open in Y, f^-1(W)= \/ f^-1(W /\ Ui) = is the union of open sets in X;

each W/\Ui is open, and W/\Ui is contained in Ui.

( where \/ is the union over I ; /\ is intersection over I ); same for V closed in Y.


2) If I is infinite, the argument can break down , i.e., if {Ui } is a closed cover

for X (each Ui is closed) ; f|_Ui is continuous and I is infinite, then this result

fails. Does anyone know of an example of this last?

As an example where it fails, take any discontinuous function f:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{R} and consider the closed cover (\{x\})_{x\in \mathbb{R}}, doesn't that work?
 
Micromass: but how do we then define f|_x to be continuous?
 
Bacle said:
Micromass: but how do we then define f|_x to be continuous?

Just define f\vert_{\{x\}}:\{x\}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}:x\rightarrow f(x). This is clearly continuous since \{x\} is indiscrete...
 
Right, good point; thanks.
 
A sphere as topological manifold can be defined by gluing together the boundary of two disk. Basically one starts assigning each disk the subspace topology from ##\mathbb R^2## and then taking the quotient topology obtained by gluing their boundaries. Starting from the above definition of 2-sphere as topological manifold, shows that it is homeomorphic to the "embedded" sphere understood as subset of ##\mathbb R^3## in the subspace topology.
Back
Top