Local Electrodynamics in higher dimensions?

"pi"mp
Messages
129
Reaction score
1
Local Electrodynamics in higher dimensions??

So I am an unexperienced undergrad but the other day I had a few thoughts which are most likely crazy. I'm just wondering why they don't work. And whether the questions I'm asking are answered elsewhere.

So I've heard:

(i) Maxwell's equations break down on very, very small length scales. But Hermann Weyl showed they only work in (3+1)-dim spacetime.

and

(ii) Perhaps we haven't observed gravitons because they escape to higher dimensions after traveling only tiny length scales.

So I was wondering, is there some geometric way of thinking of the universe where locally, the universe is a higher dimensional space and they dimensions somehow coalesce or "smooth out" into the usual (3+1)-dimensions at larger lengths? Might Maxwell's electrodynamics be only approximate but break down locally?

I might not even be asking sensible questions and I certainly don't know enough mathematics to ask it more concisely, but any thoughts would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's pretty much what string theory does ... what you do is curl the extra dimensions up real tight.
 
ah thank you...so the infinities that plague ED and QED, aren't these only problematic with point charges? Does the local geometry fix this?
 
No - the infinities that plague QED are not only problematic for point charges.
 
So thinking about my original post more now that I know more geometry, is the idea that the dimensions that you say are "curled up" locally, are from a vector or fibre bundle at that point on spacetime? Then the problematic point charges can be regarded as loops in the bundle but project down to a point still.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top