Local Reference Frame: Explaining What It Is?

surajt88
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
According to this, if someone spins around at 2 revs per second when the moon is in the horizon, the moon seems to move at 4 times the speed of light. And this implies the moon is not in our local reference frame. And per this, local inertial frame applies to "small regions of a gravitational field". So the moon and Earth are not in a "small region of a gravitational field"?:confused: I know all this boils down to the explanation what a reference frame is. Can someone clarify?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A frame which is spinning at 2 rev/s is not inertial even locally.

Essentially, a reference frame is a coordinate system*. You can imaging putting accelerometers at rest at each point in the coordinate system. If those accelerometers all read 0 all the time and are not changing distance wrt each other, then the reference frame is inertial. In GR, that can only be done locally.


*Technically, it is sloppy usage and a reference frame is what is called a "frame field", but the distinction is not usually important.
 
surajt88 said:
According to this, if someone spins around at 2 revs per second when the moon is in the horizon, the moon seems to move at 4 times the speed of light. And this implies the moon is not in our local reference frame. And per this, local inertial frame applies to "small regions of a gravitational field". So the moon and Earth are not in a "small region of a gravitational field"?:confused: I know all this boils down to the explanation what a reference frame is. Can someone clarify?
You seem to refer to reference frames in general relativity. However, special relativity is easier to understand although it ignores some small effects due to gravitational fields - effects that are of little relevance for your issue. SR uses the same "reference frames" as the reference systems that Newton's theory referred to: coordinate systems with clocks that are in rectilinear, uniform motion. The laws of physics (such as about the speed of light) do not refer to a spinning reference system.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Back
Top