Location of the particles when 1.5 periods of a sound wave have passed

AI Thread Summary
When 1.5 periods of a sound wave pass, the discussion clarifies that compressions and rarefactions alternate, but there is confusion regarding the answer key's depiction. The answer key shows only 7 out of 9 particles at t=3s, leading to questions about the omission of P1 and P9. The initial positions indicate that P1, P2, and P3 form a compression, while P4, P5, and P6 create a rarefaction, and P7, P8, and P9 form another compression. It is suggested that the diagram's width may have limited the inclusion of all particles, but drawing all 9 in their correct positions is not considered wrong. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accurately representing particle positions in wave diagrams.
ellieee
Messages
78
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
draw the positions of the particles for t=3.0s. particles take 2s to complete one full oscillation.
Relevant Equations
compressions and rarefactions
CamScanner 05-04-2021 14.01_6.jpg

qn iv.
I understand that when 1.5 periods pass, every compression will become rarefaction, and every rarefaction will become compression(someone please correct if wrong) but the answer key shows something else.
I'm interpreting the answer key drawing to be 1 compression and 4 rarefactions? someone pls correct me if I am wrong thank you:)
 

Attachments

  • CamScanner 05-06-2021 13.24_2_edit_9348621878260.jpg
    CamScanner 05-06-2021 13.24_2_edit_9348621878260.jpg
    11.6 KB · Views: 137
Physics news on Phys.org
I’m impressed by the way you have managed to manipulate the first image into a wave-shape, to match the topic. Well done!

Call the 9 particles (left-to-right) P1, P2, … P8 and P9.
This means P5 is what the question just calls ‘P’.

In your answer key diagram, the bottom row shows the t=0 positions of all 9 particles. But the top row (for t=3s) shows only 7 of the 9 particles.

At t=0:
P1, P2 and P3 form a compression;
P4, P5 and P6 form a rarefaction;
P7, P8 and P9 form a compression.

At t=3s (as shown on top row of answer key diagram):
P2 and P3 form part of a rarefaction (P1 is too far left to show on the diagram);
P4, P5 and P6 form a compression;
P7 and P8 form part of a rarefaction (P9 is too far right to show on the diagram).

Edit. Typo' corrected.
 
Last edited:
but what's their reason for not showing P9 and P1? if we still draw them out, is it "wrong"?
Steve4Physics said:
I’m impressed by the way you have managed to manipulate the first image into a wave-shape, to match the topic. Well done!

Call the 9 particles (left-to-right) P1, P2, … P8 and P9.
This means P5 is what the question just calls ‘P’.

In your answer key diagram, the bottom row shows the t=0 positions of all 9 particles. But the top row (for t=3s) shows only 7 of the 9 particles.

At t=0:
P1, P2 and P3 form a compression;
P4, P5 and P6 form a rarefaction;
P7, P8 and P9 form a compression.

At t=3s (as shown on top row of answer key diagram):
P2 and P3 form part of a rarefaction (P1 is too far left to show on the diagram);
P4, P5 and P6 form a compression;
P7 and P8 form part of a rarefaction (P9 is too far right to show on the diagram).

Edit. Typo' corrected.
 
ellieee said:
but what's their reason for not showing P9 and P1? if we still draw them out, is it "wrong"?
I'd guess that including P1 and P9 would make the diagram too wide to fit into the available printing-width.

Ideally, whoever prepared the diagrams should have made them smaller (less wide); then all 9 particles could be included in both the t=0 and t=3s diagrams.

It's not wrong to draw all 9 particles, providing they are in the correct positions. If there were enough space, that's what I'd do.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top