Location of the particles when 1.5 periods of a sound wave have passed

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

When analyzing the position of particles in a sound wave after 1.5 periods, it is established that every compression transforms into a rarefaction and vice versa. The discussion clarifies that at t=0, particles P1, P2, and P3 create a compression, while P4, P5, and P6 form a rarefaction, and P7, P8, and P9 create another compression. At t=3 seconds, the configuration changes, with P2 and P3 contributing to a rarefaction, while P4, P5, and P6 remain a compression, and P7 and P8 form part of another rarefaction. The omission of particles P1 and P9 in the diagram is attributed to space constraints rather than an error in representation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of sound wave mechanics
  • Familiarity with wave properties such as compression and rarefaction
  • Basic knowledge of particle representation in wave diagrams
  • Ability to interpret graphical representations of wave behavior
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of wave propagation in different mediums
  • Learn about the mathematical representation of sound waves
  • Explore the concept of wave interference and its effects on sound
  • Investigate the impact of particle density on wave speed and behavior
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching wave mechanics, and anyone interested in the dynamics of sound waves and their graphical representations.

ellieee
Messages
78
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
draw the positions of the particles for t=3.0s. particles take 2s to complete one full oscillation.
Relevant Equations
compressions and rarefactions
CamScanner 05-04-2021 14.01_6.jpg

qn iv.
I understand that when 1.5 periods pass, every compression will become rarefaction, and every rarefaction will become compression(someone please correct if wrong) but the answer key shows something else.
I'm interpreting the answer key drawing to be 1 compression and 4 rarefactions? someone pls correct me if I am wrong thank you:)
 

Attachments

  • CamScanner 05-06-2021 13.24_2_edit_9348621878260.jpg
    CamScanner 05-06-2021 13.24_2_edit_9348621878260.jpg
    11.6 KB · Views: 146
Physics news on Phys.org
I’m impressed by the way you have managed to manipulate the first image into a wave-shape, to match the topic. Well done!

Call the 9 particles (left-to-right) P1, P2, … P8 and P9.
This means P5 is what the question just calls ‘P’.

In your answer key diagram, the bottom row shows the t=0 positions of all 9 particles. But the top row (for t=3s) shows only 7 of the 9 particles.

At t=0:
P1, P2 and P3 form a compression;
P4, P5 and P6 form a rarefaction;
P7, P8 and P9 form a compression.

At t=3s (as shown on top row of answer key diagram):
P2 and P3 form part of a rarefaction (P1 is too far left to show on the diagram);
P4, P5 and P6 form a compression;
P7 and P8 form part of a rarefaction (P9 is too far right to show on the diagram).

Edit. Typo' corrected.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
but what's their reason for not showing P9 and P1? if we still draw them out, is it "wrong"?
Steve4Physics said:
I’m impressed by the way you have managed to manipulate the first image into a wave-shape, to match the topic. Well done!

Call the 9 particles (left-to-right) P1, P2, … P8 and P9.
This means P5 is what the question just calls ‘P’.

In your answer key diagram, the bottom row shows the t=0 positions of all 9 particles. But the top row (for t=3s) shows only 7 of the 9 particles.

At t=0:
P1, P2 and P3 form a compression;
P4, P5 and P6 form a rarefaction;
P7, P8 and P9 form a compression.

At t=3s (as shown on top row of answer key diagram):
P2 and P3 form part of a rarefaction (P1 is too far left to show on the diagram);
P4, P5 and P6 form a compression;
P7 and P8 form part of a rarefaction (P9 is too far right to show on the diagram).

Edit. Typo' corrected.
 
ellieee said:
but what's their reason for not showing P9 and P1? if we still draw them out, is it "wrong"?
I'd guess that including P1 and P9 would make the diagram too wide to fit into the available printing-width.

Ideally, whoever prepared the diagrams should have made them smaller (less wide); then all 9 particles could be included in both the t=0 and t=3s diagrams.

It's not wrong to draw all 9 particles, providing they are in the correct positions. If there were enough space, that's what I'd do.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ellieee

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
11K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K