Logical Equivalence of x <=> y and (x-->y) ^ ((~x)-->(~y))

  • Thread starter Thread starter aorick21
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equivalence
aorick21
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Prove x <=> y is logically equivalent to (x-->y) ^ ((~x)-->(~y)).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aorick21 said:
Prove x <=> y is logically equivalent to (x-->y) ^ ((~x)-->(~y)).

Please show some sort of work or at least tell us where you are stuck. We help with your homework, not do your homework.
 
Actually, x \Leftrightarrow y is shorthand for a longer expression. Which one? Now rewrite one of the subexpressions and you're done.

If you want more specific help, please refer to l46kok's post.

Also, how specific do you need the proof to be? Can you use "intuitive" rules or do you really have to produce a proof tree?
 
Last edited:
I'd just use a truth table.

If you don't know what that is, then I don't think you belong in math.
 
TimNguyen said:
I'd just use a truth table.

If you don't know what that is, then I don't think you belong in math.

Rubbish. If you do know what one is then perhaps you belong in computer science or electrical engineering?
 
Aoik: what is the contrapositive of ~x=>~y

p.s.: Matt, you crack me up.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top