Logical Specs: Why Numbers are Blurry in Rear-View Mirrors

  • Thread starter Thread starter specs
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
When looking in a rear-view mirror, the reflection of objects appears at a different distance than they actually are, which can affect focus. Spectacles correct vision for distant objects, but the brain must adjust focus differently for reflections. The mirror creates an image that seems to be behind it, complicating how one perceives distance. This explains why nearby objects, like number plates, can appear blurry without glasses, while closer items, like stickers, may remain clear. Understanding the optics of mirrors clarifies these visual discrepancies.
specs
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi, I hope you can answer this question that is baffling me.
I now require spectacles for driving; anything more than 20 feet away is a blur.
But my near vision is perfect, so fine print from a book is no problem.
So why, without my spectacles on and looking in a rear-view mirror, which is approx 16 inches away and at head height, are the number plates of the cars behind blurry?
If I then put my new specs on the number plates are perfectly clear.
I tried my own off the cuff experiment, and stuck a sticker on the rear-view mirror with some writing on it, and without glasses it was perfectly clear, when I tried my specs the sticker’s text became distorted.
Thank you in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Look into a mirror, one at home preferably. Notice that you have to focus differently when you look at objects that are further or closer in the mirror. This is just like you would have to do if you turned around and looked at those same objects. The mirror doesn't make it look like the objects are the same distance away as the mirror is.
 
The image that you see in a mirror is not in the plane of the mirror. It's behind the mirror, in fact it's the same distance behind the mirror as the original object is in front of the mirror.

15120205.jpg


This assumes a plane (flat) mirror. Curved mirrors are another matter.
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top