Can You Solve These Root-Based Simultaneous Equations Without Guessing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter McLaren Rulez
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the simultaneous equations involving square roots: √x + y = 7 and √y + x = 11. The straightforward solution is found to be x = 9 and y = 4, but the thread explores more elegant methods that avoid guessing. By substituting and manipulating the equations, a fourth-degree polynomial is derived, which can be factored to find one root. Suggestions include using the cubic root formula and considering substitutions like a = √x and b = √y for potentially simpler solutions. The conversation highlights various approaches to find the roots of the equations systematically.
McLaren Rulez
Messages
289
Reaction score
3
Given the simultaneous equations for real numbers x and y:

\sqrt{x}+y=7

and

\sqrt{y}+x=11

Find the solution. Guessing it is easy (the answers are 9 and 4) and the brute force way to do it is when you square and make subsitutions, ultimately leading to an equation of the fourth power in one variable.

Is there a more elegant but formal way, that doesn't require me to guess the answer?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Maybe letting $a=\sqrt{x}$ and $b=\sqrt{y}$? I haven't tried it yet, but it might work.
 
There's the rational root theorem that'll give you all rational solutions to a polynomial.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top