Looking for an Experiment about water

  • Thread starter Thread starter mmcoelho
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment Water
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a science experiment demonstrating the water cycle, where ice placed on a wooden board melted and created the illusion of rain, leading to misconceptions among primary school children about water passing through solid objects. A teacher requested a new experiment to clarify that water does not permeate solids. Suggestions include using a metal pot instead of a wooden board or demonstrating condensation on an empty cold bottle to show that water forms from the air, not from inside the bottle. The goal is to create an experiment that effectively addresses the children's misunderstanding of water's behavior. The conversation highlights the need for clear, engaging experiments to teach fundamental scientific concepts.
mmcoelho
My Science teacher showed us an experiment about the Water Cycle and the interpretation kids (from primary school) had made about it.

I haven't found a link with the actal experiment, but I'll try to describe it.

There was a pot on heat, a hair drier pointing to it in direction to a wooden board and on the top of the wood board, there was ice.

The result was that the ice melted and it started "raining".


Most kids thought the water went through the wooden board and simply showed up in the other side.

Because of that, our Science teacher has requested us an experiment to help them understand that the water doesn't go through the solid wooden board...

I've been searching in the net but I'm not a native speaker, so I'm having difficulties in finding one. Can you help? Thanks,

Maria,
Portugal
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by mmcoelho
Because of that, our Science teacher has requested us an experiment to help them understand that the water doesn't go through the solid wooden board...
Why not try the experiment without using a board? Instead of putting the ice on a board, put the ice in a metal pot.
 
Thanks for your answer ;-)

The problem is that my teacher wants a different experiment :-( and not a change in the original one. She said the kids had trouble understading the the water simply doesn't go through objects and asked for an experiment that cleared the kids doubt once and for all. She mentioned opacity (although I didn't understand the relation)...

TIA

Maria
 
Yes that's the way kids think. When you take a cold (closed) bottle out of the fridge, drops of water will form on the outside of the bottle. If you ask the kids why is this, they will say it comes from the inside. So, to prove it doesn't come from the inside but out of the air, next you use an empty bottle...
 
Thanks! It's a good idea!

Maria
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top