Looking further and further into the past?

  • Thread starter Thread starter pwdrmntainski
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Looking at the night sky allows us to observe the past, as the photons reaching our eyes have traveled for years. Telescopes enhance our ability to see further back in time by observing more distant objects, which emit photons that take longer to reach us. The age of these photons is determined by the distance they travel; thus, more powerful telescopes can capture light from farther away, revealing older cosmic events. While telescopes observe current photons, their increased power enables the observation of objects that are further in the past. This understanding clarifies the relationship between telescope capability and the temporal depth of cosmic observation.
pwdrmntainski
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I understand how looking at the night sky is, essentially, peering into the past, as the photons that hit your eye have been traveling for years and years. I read that telescopes, as they progressively strengthen, give us the ability to look even further into the past. This is what confuses me.

Telescopes can see further, but aren't they still observing the photons that are hitting the lens at the current moment?

Hold up! I may have answered my question while thinking about it. The age of the photons (and how far into the past you're looking) is dependent upon the distance they've traveled. The further the object that the photon originated from, the longer the photon must travel to reach us and the "older" it is.

So the telescopes are still observing the photons that are hitting their lenses, it's just as they get more powerful, the objects they are viewing get further away, resulting in our ability to look even further into the past?

I apologize that this thread is essentially my train of thought regarding the issue. I would really appreciate any insight and guidance towards the answer.

Thanks in advance!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Hello Powder Mtn,
welcome. You seem to have answered your question. So think of a new question or something you want to learn about.
 
Except that large telescopes use mirrors rather than lenses, spot on.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
Today at about 4:30 am I saw the conjunction of Venus and Jupiter, where they were about the width of the full moon, or one half degree apart. Did anyone else see it? Edit: The moon is 2,200 miles in diameter and at a distance of 240,000 miles. Thereby it subtends an angle in radians of 2,200/240,000=.01 (approximately). With pi radians being 180 degrees, one radian is 57.3 degrees, so that .01 radians is about .50 degrees (angle subtended by the moon). (.57 to be more exact, but with...
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...

Similar threads

Back
Top