Loop contributions of the Quantum Action

In summary, the tree level diagrams of the quantum action are not the complete set of diagrams for a given process. The loop diagrams derived from the quantum action have some physical significance, but I am not sure how it is possible.
  • #1
bobloblaw
19
0
As far as I understand the tree level diagrams of the quantum action in QFT give the complete set of diagrams for a give process. Do the loop diagrams of the quantum action have any physical significance?

I thought maybe that by summing up all the diagrams in the quantum action might take us back to the "normal" action but after some thought this doesn't seem to be the case.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hmm, not sure I totally understand, but certainly the tree level diagrams are NOT the complete set of diagrams for a given process. Perhaps you mean that processes that do not have a tree level diagram don't happen, and that loop diagrams just modify the allowed tree-level processes? This is also not true; there are many processes that are forbidden at tree level, but allowed at 1 or 2 or more loops. Here is an example:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/82/Kaon-box-diagram-with-bar.svg

Kaon oscillations are forbidden at tree level (in the Standard Model) but they can proceed at the 1-loop level like so. Since one-loop diagrams are suppressed by a higher power of the couplings than tree level it makes such processes more rare, but they wouldn't happen at all if only the tree-level processes were allowed. Many many such things happen in nature.

Not sure if this answers your question.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
I think we might be talking about different things. I'm not talking about the tree level Feynman diagrams derived from the standard lagrangian but the feynman diagrams derived from the diagrams the quantum action or quantum effective action.

So for example in [itex]\phi^3[/itex] the quantum action reads

[itex]
S = -\frac{1}{2}\int \frac{d^dk}{(2\pi)^d}\phi(-k)\left(k^2+m^2-\Pi(k^2)\right)\phi(k)
+ \sum^{\infty}_{n=3}\int \frac{d^dk_1}{(2\pi)^d}\cdots\frac{d^dk_n}{(2\pi)^d}(2\pi)^d\delta^d(k_1+\cdots+k_n) \times V_n(k_1,\cdots,k_n)\phi(k_1)\cdots\phi(k_n)
[/itex]

As Srednicki says:
"The quantum action has the property that the tree-level Feynman diagrams it generates give the complete scattering amplitude of the original theory"

So my question is do the loop diagrams derived from the quantum action have any physical significance?

Your point is interesting though because I hadn't seen any processes that were forbidden classically although it makes sense.
 
  • #4
Hmm I see. Well actually I haven't read Srednicki's book, but from what I quickly read of it on google books just now it does indeed seem like this "effective action" he is computing takes into account quantum corrections in some way such that you only need the tree diagrams it generates. This is a very strange concept to me though and I am not sure how it can be true. This formulation of field theory seems unusual; at least, I haven't seen it before, sorry. It looks like the path integral formulation but with a strange twist.
 

Related to Loop contributions of the Quantum Action

1. What are loop contributions in quantum action?

Loop contributions refer to the summation of all possible particle interactions within a quantum system. These interactions are represented by Feynman diagrams that form closed loops, hence the term "loop contributions".

2. How do loop contributions affect quantum action?

Loop contributions play a crucial role in quantum action as they account for the effects of virtual particles that continuously pop in and out of existence. These contributions can result in corrections to the values of physical quantities, such as mass and charge, and can also affect the behavior of the system as a whole.

3. Can loop contributions be calculated accurately?

Calculating loop contributions is a complex and challenging task, as it involves accounting for an infinite number of possible interactions. However, advanced mathematical techniques, such as perturbation theory and renormalization, have been developed to approximate these contributions and provide accurate results.

4. How do loop contributions relate to the renormalization group?

The renormalization group is a mathematical framework used to study the behavior of physical theories at different energy scales. Loop contributions are an essential part of this framework, as they allow for the study of how physical quantities change as the energy scale is varied.

5. Are loop contributions present in all quantum systems?

Yes, loop contributions are present in all quantum systems, including the Standard Model of particle physics. They are a fundamental aspect of quantum field theory and play a crucial role in understanding the behavior of particles and interactions at the microscopic level.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
9
Views
641
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
54
Views
4K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
3
Replies
91
Views
5K
Back
Top