Lorentz Algebra Vector Rep: How to Derive 4x4 Matrices?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Lapidus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vector
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The vector representation of the Lorentz algebra in four dimensions is explicitly defined by six 4x4 matrices, as detailed in Peskin and Schroeder's "An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory" on page 39, formula 3.18. A four-vector can be expressed as a tensor product of left-handed and right-handed Weyl spinors. The mapping of a 4-vector to a bispinor is given by the equation Vμ → Vμμ)α ̅α. Additionally, the representation of SO(3,1) can be transformed into SU(2)×SU(2) representations using specific matrix relations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lorentz algebra and its representations
  • Familiarity with Weyl spinors and their properties
  • Knowledge of tensor products in quantum field theory
  • Basic grasp of matrix notation and transformations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Peskin and Schroeder's "An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory" for foundational concepts
  • Explore the Weyl spinor representation of the Lorentz algebra in detail
  • Learn about the mapping of representations between SO(3,1) and SU(2)×SU(2)
  • Read "Symmetries and the Standard Model" by Robinson for comprehensive insights on Lorentz symmetry
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory, theoretical physicists working with Lorentz symmetry, and students seeking to understand the mathematical foundations of particle physics.

Lapidus
Messages
344
Reaction score
12
The vector representation of the Lorentz algebra in 4 dimensions can be very explicitly given by six 4x4 matrices. Peskin/Schroeder has it on page 39, formula 3.18, for example

But then a four-vector is also a tensor product of a left-handed and a right-handed Weyl spinor!

Knowing the Weyl spinor represenation of the Lorentz algebra, how do I arrive at these explicit matrices for the vector representation?

Strangely, no book explains that. Though, many make a lot of effort showing how vectors, Dirac spinors and tensors are direct sums and/ or products of Weyl spinors, they just give the explicit formula for the vector representation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can map a 4-vector to a bispinor via

[tex]V^\mu \rightarrow V^\mu (\sigma_\mu)_{\alpha \dot{\alpha}}.[/tex]

More generally, you can use this to map any representation of [itex]SO(3,1)[/itex] to a representation of [itex]SU(2)\times SU(2)[/itex]. In principle you can work out the representations from one side to the other via

[tex]{\Lambda^\mu}_\nu V^\nu (\sigma_\mu)_{\alpha \dot{\alpha}} = {M_\alpha}^\beta V^\mu (\sigma_\mu)_{\beta \dot{\beta}} {M^{\dot{\beta}}}_{\dot{\alpha}}.[/tex]
 
Thank fzero!

I saw that in Srednicki's book, too, but could not quite decipher what he means. But that's probably because I have not bothered yet to learn this funny dot notation...

Luckily I discovered that in this new book Symmetries and the Standard Model by Robinson, that there is a lovely section on Lorentz symmetry and all its representation. By the way the whole book is great!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
9K