Lorentz boost and equivalence with 3d hyperbolic rotations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the equivalence of Lorentz boosts and 3D hyperbolic rotations, specifically in the context of transformations in special relativity. The original poster questions the validity of this equivalence and explores the possibility of a homomorphism between subgroups of space rotations and the Lorentz transform. It is concluded that while the concept of hyperbolic rotations exists, they do not maintain the invariance of vector magnitudes in the pseudo-euclidean metric of spacetime, thus invalidating the proposed equivalence. The discussion also touches on the representation of the Lorentz group through pseudo-orthogonal matrices.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lorentz transformations in special relativity
  • Familiarity with hyperbolic geometry and hyperbolic rotations
  • Knowledge of pseudo-euclidean metrics
  • Basic concepts of group theory and homomorphisms
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of Lorentz transformations and their implications in physics
  • Study hyperbolic geometry and its applications in relativity
  • Explore the concept of pseudo-orthogonal matrices and their representations
  • Investigate group theory, focusing on homomorphisms and their physical interpretations
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, mathematicians, and students studying special relativity, group theory, and geometric transformations in theoretical physics.

chwie
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
I was thinking that if i have for example a boost in the direction of x, then the boost should be equivalent to an hyperbolic rotation of the y and z axes in the other direction. I don't know if it's true or not. Then I want to know if somebody knows this result or why is false?

I was thinking also that is possible to make an homomorphism between some subgroup of the space rotations by complex angle (six parameter group) and some subgroup of the Lorentz transform (six parameter group). Also i don't know if that homomorphism is possible and I'm too lazy like to try to do the proof it myself. If somebody knows why is impossible to make such homomorphism or if there is some theorem that proof this, please let me know. Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you talking about something like the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebra_of_physical_space"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nope, that is the homomorphism between 2x2 unimodular matrix and the restricted Lorentz group, but thanks for the help.

Well i was myself trying to proof about the equivalence of the boost and the 3d hyperbolic rotations, but the problem is to find the hyperbolic rotation that leaves the magnitude of the z and y vector invariant, and can be done using imaginaries terms, but the physics is not equivalent, then i was wrong. I don't know why I thought was possible, in an 4D euclidean space is possible to do similar relations, but because of the pseudo-euclidean metric is not possible in this case.

Also about the Lorentz group isomorphism and the rotation with complex angle is another way to said the representation of the pseudo-orthogonal matrix in four dimension. Then that is the subgroup of the rotations with complex angle which is isomorphic with the Lorentz group. Which is the most common representation. I was hoping in finding a more general one, but was not possible.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K