When one considers a Lorentz transformation between two frames ##S## and ##S'##, such that the coordinates in ##S## are given by ##x^{\mu}## and the coordinates in ##S'## are given by ##x'^{\mu}##, with the two related by [tex]x'^{\mu}=\Lambda^{\mu}_{\;\;\nu}x^{\nu}[/tex] then a scalar field ##\phi (x)## relative to ##S## transforms as [tex]\phi '(x')=\phi (x)\qquad\text{or}\qquad\phi '(x)=\phi (\Lambda^{-1}x)[/tex] where ##\phi '(x')## is the form of the scalar field relative to the frame ##S'##. Clearly, as it is a scalar it is a Lorentz invariant quantity.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

My question (albeit a simple one, so apologies for that) is, when we transform the coordinates from those defined in ##S## to those defined in ##S'## (i.e. ##x\rightarrow x'##), am I understanding it correctly that the field transforms as ##\phi\rightarrow\phi '##, such that it has a different functional form in the two different frames, ##S## and ##S'##, but in such a way that when evaluated at a given point ##p##, then it has the same value in both frames? (That is, if a point ##p## has coordinates ##x^{\mu}## in ##S## and coordinates ##x'^{\mu}## in ##S'## then ##\phi '(x')=\phi (x)##, however, the functional form of ##\phi## will be different to the functional form of ##\phi '##)

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Lorentz scalars - transformation of a scalar field

Loading...

Similar Threads - Lorentz scalars transformation | Date |
---|---|

I Why are scalar fields Lorentz invariant? | Aug 18, 2016 |

Basis vectors in SR and Lorentz scalar fields | Oct 2, 2015 |

Lorentz-Invariant Scalar Products | Sep 26, 2014 |

Derivative of a function of a lorentz scalar | Sep 24, 2011 |

Differences between Lorentz scalars and Lorentz invariants | Feb 1, 2008 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**