Lorentz transformation for time - why the 'x' term?

In summary: And the dependence on x - why should the distance of S to the event affect how time is affected in S' frame? This distance dependence doesn't appear in the time dilation formulas I see in all the textbooks I've flipped through!The distance dependence on x is a direct result of the principle of relativity. It is a consequence of the fact that two events which happen at the same time in frame A will happen at different times in frame B if they have different positions in the x direction. The principle of relativity states that the laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of reference (frames of motion). This means that the speed of light is the same in all frames. However, the relative
  • #1
chipotleaway
174
0
I have two questions having to do with the Lorentz transformation for the time...some preamble first:

The Lorentz transformation for time along the x-axis is
[tex]t'=\frac{t-\frac{ux}{c^2}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{u^2}{c^2}}}[/tex], where u is the relative velocity of S'.

Why is there a dependence on x there? I'm interpreting x to be the distance between the origin of S and some event. At t=0, the origins of S' and S cross and their clocks are synced. S' is moving to the right at velocity u relative to S. When an event occurs at (x,t) according to S, it occurs at (x', t') for S'.

i) Let's say t=2s in the frame of S. Is t' the time that S' sees the event according to S? So in her frame, S' really sees it happening at 2 seconds but when she alerts S, t' has passed for S (t'>t)?

ii) And the dependence on x - why should the distance of S to the event affect how time is affected in S' frame? This distance dependence doesn't appear in the time dilation formulas I see in all the textbooks I've flipped through!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
chipotleaway said:
Why is there a dependence on x there?
The dependence on x in the Lorentz transform is the mathematical expression of the relativity of simultaneity. Two events which happen at the same time in frame A will happen at different times in frame B if they have different positions in the x direction.

chipotleaway said:
This distance dependence doesn't appear in the time dilation formulas I see in all the textbooks I've flipped through!
The Lorentz transform is the general formula and should be the one that you memorize. The simplified time dilation formula is a special case of the Lorentz transform for use only when calculating the time between two events which are at the same location in one frame. In that case Δx=0 and that term drops out of the equation.

Do NOT use the simplified formula if you do not fully understand its limitations. Instead, use the full Lorentz transform which will automatically simplify when appropriate.
 
  • #3
chipotleaway said:
i) Let's say t=2s in the frame of S. Is t' the time that S' sees the event according to S? So in her frame, S' really sees it happening at 2 seconds but when she alerts S, t' has passed for S (t'>t)?
No, the coordinates of an event in each frame apply only to that frame and have nothing to do with any other frame.

It's not enough to say t=2s in frame S when talking about an event. There are an infinite number of events at different locations with t=2s. You have to also specify its location to identify an event in frame S. Once you do that, you can transform those time and location coordinates into the time and location coordinates for any other frame moving at any speed with respect to S.

Then you should say that the given event happens at x,t in S and at x',t' in S'. It has nothing to do with anything that any observer really sees. The coordinates that are applied to any particular frame have nothing to do with what any particular observer really sees, not even the frame in which a particular observer is at rest. You can analyze what all observers really see using any frame and transform to any other frame and they will still see the same things. All frames are equally valid. None is more real than any other. None is preferred over any other.
 

1. What is the Lorentz transformation for time?

The Lorentz transformation for time is a mathematical equation that describes how time intervals and events are perceived differently by observers in different frames of reference, specifically in the context of special relativity.

2. How does the 'x' term affect the Lorentz transformation for time?

The 'x' term in the Lorentz transformation for time represents the distance between the observer and the event being measured. It is used to account for the fact that events occurring in one frame of reference may appear to occur at different times in another frame of reference due to relative motion.

3. Why is the 'x' term necessary in the Lorentz transformation for time?

The 'x' term is necessary in the Lorentz transformation for time because it allows for the effects of time dilation and length contraction to be taken into account. Without it, the equation would not accurately describe how time intervals and events are perceived by observers in different frames of reference.

4. Can the Lorentz transformation for time be used for any type of motion?

Yes, the Lorentz transformation for time can be used for any type of motion, as long as it is constant and in a straight line. It is a fundamental equation in the theory of special relativity and is applicable to all inertial frames of reference.

5. How does the 'x' term change for different types of motion?

The 'x' term in the Lorentz transformation for time remains the same for all types of motion, as long as the motion is constant and in a straight line. However, for accelerated motion, the equation becomes more complex and may involve additional variables to account for the effects of acceleration on time intervals and events.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
101
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
54
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
525
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top