Can Analog Electronics Achieve Real Time Pitch Lowering?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zeor137
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pitch Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of achieving real-time pitch lowering using only analog electronics. While analog effects pedals can lower pitch without noticeable delay, they are typically monophonic and may not meet the "real-time" criteria, as the output length doubles compared to the input. Software solutions exist for independent pitch and speed adjustments, though they can introduce distortion. Real-time processing is defined as continuous output, but any electronic processing inherently introduces some delay. Historical methods, like tape systems with rotating heads, illustrate the challenges of achieving seamless pitch changes, which can be improved with modern RAM-based systems.
Zeor137
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I want to project a circuit that lower the pitch of a sound input by half and plays it closer to real time as possible. I thought about converting the input to digital and then to analogical, with a slower clock. But I wonder if i could do it using only analogical electronics.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I don't think the term "real time" is applicable here. If the beginning of your converted sound coincides with the beginning of the original sound, then the end of the converted sound will occur at double the length of the original.
 
There are many guitar effects pedals that do this; to make the guitar sound like a bass by lowering the pitch an octave.

Read about them on wiki:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octave_effect

Most pedal schematics can be found online via google.

All of the analog ones are monophonic And (like all effects pedals) there is no noticeable time delay, no one would buy a pedal that puts you behind the beat!

Check out the EHX POG, HOG and POG 2 for polyphonic circuits. (P/HOG = polyphonic/Harmonic octave generator).
 
skeptic2 said:
I don't think the term "real time" is applicable here. If the beginning of your converted sound coincides with the beginning of the original sound, then the end of the converted sound will occur at double the length of the original.

Software to process audio to change the pitch and the speed of music independently by arbitrary amounts (not just factors of 2) is easy to find. Of course it introduces some form of distortion, either by cutting out cycles of the original or repeating them, but the results are acceptable to listen to, whatever a frequency analyzer or distortion meter might say about them. The signal processing algorithms are well known.

The speed of sound in air is about 1 foot per millisecond, so "real time" processing delays of a few milliseconds are not very important, and a modern PC can do a lot of processing in a few milliseconds.
 
Try a search on "Darth Vader Voice" .
 
skeptic2 said:
I don't think the term "real time" is applicable here. If the beginning of your converted sound coincides with the beginning of the original sound, then the end of the converted sound will occur at double the length of the original.

If you are providing a continuous output from a processor - rather than batch processing - you can call it 'real time'. If you want to be fussy you would say that absolutely any electronic processing introduces some delay and it's not really real time.

The original 'real time' pitch changing was done with a tape with a fixed record head and a set of playback heads on a rotating drum (like on a VHS player). The heads would read off the tape faster or slower than the recorded material - according to which way the drum was rotating. Of course, each replay head would rotate until it lost contact with the tape and then another head would take over. Fine - except there was a change of phase and amplitude as one head took over from another. It's not hard to do the equivalent with a RAM based system. You can get a much more convincing effect this way because you can window the data as you crossover between 'virtual' read heads (memory pointers).
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
7K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Back
Top