Lunar Space Elevator: Is a Rocketless Trip Possible?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the feasibility of a lunar space elevator, highlighting the challenges of omitting rockets and chemical propulsion. It notes that the moon's varying position complicates anchoring the cable to Earth. The concept of a space elevator from Earth to a geostationary satellite is deemed theoretically simpler, while a lunar elevator to a satellite is even easier. The idea of a dangling elevator from the moon raises questions about its movement over Earth's surface, particularly due to Earth's rotation. Overall, the practicality of a lunar space elevator presents significant technical and logistical hurdles.
BosonJaw
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Lunar space elevator...

Based on my limited understanding of the idea.

If this system were to omit a rocket or chemical propellant power plant and is not an unbound free traveling vehicle, I would infer, given the distance of the journey the travel time may venture into the realm of the preposterous... Am I wrong?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
A space elevator directly to the moon has the disadvantage that the moon isn't always over the same place on Earth making it rather tricky to anchor the bottom of the cable.

A space elavator from the Earth to a geostationary satelite is theoretically quite simple, although a bit of a materials challenge. A simialir elevator from the moons surface to a satelite around the moon is even easier. Going between the two statiosn is pretty easy,
 
How fast the Moon?

Just supposing you dropped a space elevator from the Moon to the Earth. The bottom doesn't have to be attached to the Earth, the bottom could just, well, sort of dangle there over the surface of the Earth.

If you did do that, how fast would the dangling tip of the Lunar S.E. move over the surface of the Earth?
 
The Earth is rotating (at the equator ) at around 900mph (40,000km in 24hours)
Even ignoring the motion of the moon that is going to create problems.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...

Similar threads

Back
Top