Why does the product of the gradients of perpendicular lines equal -1 in 3D?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yh Hoo
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The product of the gradients of two perpendicular lines in 3D is always -1 because their slopes are negative reciprocals of each other. When one line has a gradient m, the perpendicular line has a gradient of -1/m. This relationship can be demonstrated through geometric proofs involving similar triangles, where the angles and corresponding sides maintain proportionality. Additionally, trigonometric principles and vector analysis in 3D reinforce this concept, confirming that the slopes of perpendicular lines will always multiply to -1. Understanding this relationship is essential for grasping the geometric properties of lines in various dimensions.
Yh Hoo
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
M1.m2 = -1 ??

Why is the product of the gradients of 2 straight line perpendicular to each other is always equal to -1 ?? Is there any theory to explain this ??
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


The slopes of perpendicular lines are negative reciprocals of each other. So if y_{1} and y_{2} are perpendicular lines (in standard form) then \frac{\mathrm{d} y_{1}}{\mathrm{d} x} = m and \frac{\mathrm{d} y_{2}}{\mathrm{d} x} = -m^{-1} so their products will simply be -1.
 


I think the easiest proof is a geometric one using similar triangles.

- The attachment shows a line, gradient m1, and a perpendicular.

- The two angles marked with dots are equal. (Complementary to common angle).

- By similar triangles d/1 = 1/m1

- By definition (rise/run) the gradient of the perpendicular = -d/1 = -1/m1
 

Attachments

  • perpline.jpg
    perpline.jpg
    15.6 KB · Views: 3,811
Last edited:


Yh Hoo said:
Why is the product of the gradients of 2 straight line perpendicular to each other is always equal to -1 ?? Is there any theory to explain this ??

There are many ways to prove this. One and the simpler way is illustrated to you by WannaBeNewton in above post .

Other ways are by trigonometry , use of trigonometrical coordinates , Use of other theorems etc.

I am showing you another simpler way by similarity of triangles ( I hope you know it.)

Let one line with side of course x1-x and y1-y be intersected by other line with side of course x3-x2 and y3-y2 be intersected at angle 90o

Now you complete their intersection by joining their ends with dotted lines (note one end will be common ie intersection point). You'll notice it will form two right angled triangles .
Now you prove those two triangles similar by their same shape .

By this ,
All corresponding sides of 2 triangles will be proportional , ie
y1-y/x1-x = x3-x2/y3-y2

or1

m1=-1/m2
(Realize one line inclination is > 90 degree hence slope is negative.)

m1 x m2 = -1

QED .
 


WannabeNewton said:
The slopes of perpendicular lines are negative reciprocals of each other. So if y_{1} and y_{2} are perpendicular lines (in standard form) then \frac{\mathrm{d} y_{1}}{\mathrm{d} x} = m and \frac{\mathrm{d} y_{2}}{\mathrm{d} x} = -m^{-1} so their products will simply be -1.

I think he meant: explain the cause of the result

attachment.php?attachmentid=38422&stc=1&d=1314772955.png


we have 2 perpendicular lines l and l1. the slope of l = -y/x and the slope of l1 = y1/x1

triangle (O,x1,y1) is similar to triangle (M,x1,x) (two angles are the same)
This triangle is also similar to triangle (O, y, x)

therefore y/x = x1/y1 and if you substitute that in the slope of l1, you'll see it's equal to x/y, so the product of the two slopes = -1
 

Attachments

  • perp.png
    perp.png
    7.1 KB · Views: 4,024


Think in 3D.

Put differently;<m,1> vector is forming 90 degrees with <n,1> vector 2D gradients since original graphs retain perpendicularity.

thus m*n+1=0*sqrt(n**2+1)sqrt(m**2+1)

You can further solve to find
m*n = -1

m=-1/n
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top