Machine design (flange coupling design) a simple question

  • Thread starter Thread starter ubnt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Design Machine
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on flange coupling design, referencing Shigley's Mechanical Engineering Design as a key source. Participants seek clarification on safety factors related to failure costs and inquire about available design tables or codes. There is confusion regarding the specific type of flange being discussed, whether for pipe junctions or drive shaft couplings. Additionally, questions arise about relevant text sections and considerations for shock or impulse factors in the design. The conversation highlights the need for precise information and resources in mechanical design.
ubnt
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Our teacher finned me 30 point for assuming a safety factor2.5for flange design, is it ok to assume a safety factor?
Our source book is shiegly if somone answer i hope he give me yhe source of his infortmation
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

The safety factor may increase with the cost of a failure.
Are there code or design tables available, where ?

I assume 'shiegly' is;
Shigley's. Mechanical Engineering Design. 10th Edition. 2015.
By Richard G. Budynas and J. Keith Nisbett.

Do you refer to a flange for a pipe junction, a drive shaft coupling, RSJ, or something else ?
What part of the text covers the subject.
 
Is there a shock / impulse / snatch factor to consider ??
 
My idea is that I want to use immerse Whitetail Antlers in a fishtank to measure their volumetric displacement (the Boone and Crockett system is the current record measurement standard to place in a juxtaposition with) I would use some sight glass plumbed into the side of the tank to get the change in height so that I can multiply by the tank cross-section. Simple Idea. But... Is there a simple mechanical way to amplify the height in the sight glass to increase measurement precision...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K