Macroscopic distinction between quantum and classical forms

Loren Booda
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
4
Quantum (number) configurations, but not classical configurations, repeat within the limits of spacetime.

Would you entertain such a definition?

I believe it to be a fundamental concept hereto overlooked.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by "repeat within the limits of spacetime."?

-Z
 
To be identical under simple symmetry transformations (translation, rotation, etc.)

Is this old hat?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top