Magnet Bar Falling in Copper Pipe: Lenz's Law Impact?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bongshn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Falling
AI Thread Summary
When a magnet bar falls through a copper pipe, it experiences a force due to Lenz's Law, which causes it to reach terminal velocity. The discussion focuses on an experiment that varies the mass of the magnet bar while keeping the magnetic field constant. The goal is to observe how changes in the mass affect the time taken for the magnet to travel through the pipe. Participants express confusion about the experiment's objectives, suggesting it may relate to homework or project work. The experiment aims to provide insights into the relationship between mass and terminal velocity in this context.
bongshn
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
as a magnet bar is falling in a copper pipe, it will reach terminal velocity due to the lenz's law. my experiment is changing on the mass of the magnet bar but not changing the magnetic field. what will happen in this case?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Am unsure what your experiment is testing...this sounds like homework/project work.
 
im mainly testing on changing the mass of the bar magnet... and finding any changes on the time taken to travel
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Magnet falling though copper pipe
2
Replies
59
Views
6K
Ballistic Lenz's Law: Magnet Induced Current in Copper Tube
Replies
3
Views
1K
I Does Diamagnetism Occur Even in a Constant Magnetic Field?
Replies
7
Views
2K
B EMF induced by Bar Magnet falling through a Coil
Replies
3
Views
525
Diamagnetism confusion -- Does diamagnetism really have to do with Lenz’s law?
Replies
5
Views
2K
Thomson's jumping ring: Why net repulsion?
Replies
1
Views
1K
Induced current and force on circular loop in varying magnetic field
Replies
4
Views
962
Lenz's Law in action with different length magnets
Replies
2
Views
2K
Lenz's Rule and Ferromagnetism
Replies
1
Views
1K
Will a Magnet and Copper Tube Hourglass Be Accurate Due to Lenz's Law?
Replies
2
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top