Magnet configuration for spinning permanent magnet induction heating

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the effects of magnet configuration in a rotor with four permanent magnets rotating inside a stationary copper or aluminum tube for induction heating. It concludes that alternating polarity (NSNS) magnets generate more heat due to greater variation in the magnetic field, while both configurations require the same torque to turn the rotor. The reasoning is that the Lorentz force remains consistent regardless of the magnet arrangement, as the field strength and relative velocity are unchanged. The discussion emphasizes the importance of experimenting with both configurations to validate these findings.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Eddy currents and Joule heating
  • Knowledge of Lorentz force principles
  • Familiarity with permanent magnet configurations
  • Basic concepts of induction heating
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of magnet polarity on induction heating efficiency
  • Explore the design and construction of experimental setups for testing magnet configurations
  • Learn about the relationship between magnetic field variation and eddy current generation
  • Investigate torque requirements in rotating magnetic systems
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physicists, and hobbyists interested in induction heating technology, magnet design, and experimental physics will benefit from this discussion.

positron96
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Watch this video:

Permanent magnets moving relative to a stationary copper tube generate Eddy currents which result in Joule heating of the copper. Simple enough.

Let's change the problem to a rotor with 4 (circumferential) permanent magnets rotating inside a stationary (aluminum or copper) tube at some given RPM.

1. Which would heat the stator faster: magnets placed in alternating polarity (NSNS) or the same polarity (NNNN) around the rotor? I think it would be alternating because an area element on the stator would see more variation in the field per revolution.

2. Which would require more torque to turn the rotor: alternating or constant? I think they would be the same because the field strength and relative velocity are the same as the stator element passes each magnet, so the Lorentz force should be the same for both configurations.

3. Why does the alternating magnet configuration generate more heat but require the same amount of torque? Where did I go wrong?

Any links or references would be much appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
If one configuration achieves greater heating, it follows that its rotation will demand greater torque. There is no such thing as a free lunch!

I think you should build both and experiment. :smile:
 
Any eddy currents produced in the pipe would produce a counter magnetic field apposing the "changing" magnetic field of the rotating magnets. if the magnets have all the same poles, then the change in the magnetic field is mainly a change in field intensity, but if you have alternating field poles you have a complete cycle of the magnetic field from a maximum positive direction, then through a point with no magnetic influence, then a maximum field strength in the opposite polarity, resulting in a much larger change in the magnetic field over the same time period. Only a change in the magnetic field across the pipe creates eddy currents. You get much the same effect from running a single current carrying conductor through an electrical metallic conduit due to the alternating magnetic field created by the alternating current traveling through the wire. that's why you always run the return conductor through the conduit to cancel out the magnetic fields of the feed conductor, or you run multi phase conductors all together in the same conduit for the same reason. The alternating field poles would create more heat at the same angular velocity as an armature with the same poles, and would require more torque to operate.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K