Magnetic field and a charge in room

AI Thread Summary
In a room with a strong, homogeneous magnetic field, a stationary positively charged particle experiences no force until an observer moves with respect to the field. The observer's motion alters the perceived electric and magnetic fields, leading to the Lorentz force acting on the particle. This discrepancy arises because electric and magnetic fields are not invariant and change based on the observer's frame of reference. Both observers may perceive different forces due to their relative motion, yet Maxwell's equations remain valid across all frames. Understanding this requires recognizing that electric and magnetic fields transform according to relativistic principles.
roboticmehdi
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Imagine i am in a room in which there is a strong and homogeneous magnetic field ( strong B field ). and in the middle of the room the is a positively charged particle. the room is in space so there is no gravity to accelerate the particle downward, it just floats. since the particle is not moving the is no force on it and it is stationary. but now i start to move with little speed perpendicular to B lines. the charge experiences a force since it has relative velocity. How can that be? How can it experience a force just because I am moving. and if i had a friend there who did not move with me he would say particle doesn't move and i would say it moves. how is that possible after all i am not moving at relativistic speed, only a few centimeters per second. how can we not agree with each other ? ( note: i purposely made magnetic field strong so that even little speed creates enormous force on particle, or imagine particle has huge charge so that again we have enormous force even at very little speed )
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are moving, the B-field will change from your perspective. The B-field is not an invariant, and changes depending on the motion of the observer. You will see a moving charge in a different B-field and E-field (depending on your motion and the direction of the B field) such that the effects cancel and the charge is not accelerated.

See here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativistic_electromagnetism
 
I think that you need to consider that you defined your static reference frame to be one with a uniform magnetic field in one direction, and zero electric field in all directions. However, once you move relative to this static frame, electric fields are not zero anymore. In your moving reference frame, you need to consider the total Lorentz force F=qE+vXB. I assume that if you do the transforms correctly, you will find zero net force on the charge in any inertial frame of reference.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
But Maxwell's equations must be valid in all frames of reference isn't that right? Why is it that I can use them safely for one reference frame, but for other frame of reference I have to supplement it with Einstein's special relativity ?
 
roboticmehdi said:
But Maxwell's equations must be valid in all frames of reference isn't that right? Why is it that I can use them safely for one reference frame, but for other frame of reference I have to supplement it with Einstein's special relativity ?

They are valid. You are neglecting that the field itself changes in your frame. If you moved to the left then both the field and the particle would then be moving at the same speed to the right from your view. Since the field isn't moving in relation to the particle, and the particle isn't moving in relation to the field, there is no force generated.
 
roboticmehdi said:
But Maxwell's equations must be valid in all frames of reference isn't that right? Why is it that I can use them safely for one reference frame, but for other frame of reference I have to supplement it with Einstein's special relativity ?

As said above, Maxwell's equations are valid in all frames. But, when you go from one frame to another, you have to transform the electric and magnetic fields appropriately. Electric and magnetic fields are not invariants. They are components of a 2nd rank tensor.

http://hepweb.ucsd.edu/ph110b/110b_notes/node69.html
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top