Why is the magnetic field perpendicular to the force?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding why the magnetic field is perpendicular to the magnetic force, emphasizing that this relationship is a result of the cross product in physics. It highlights that the direction of the magnetic force depends on both the magnetic field and the velocity of the electric charge, with a reversal in velocity leading to a reversal in force direction. The historical context of defining the magnetic field is linked to compass needle orientation, and the behavior of current loops aligns with this definition. Special relativity provides further insight, particularly through a thought experiment involving parallel wires, demonstrating that the magnetic force can be understood without directly referencing magnetic fields. Overall, the conversation illustrates the complex interplay between electric and magnetic fields as perceived from different reference frames.
member 392791
Hello, I was curious conceptually why the B field is perpendicular to the magnetic force. I know its a cross product, but is there some sort of conceptual argument that can convince me, other than shown by experiment.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The direction of the force also depends on the direction of the velocity of the electric charge. If you reverse the charge's velocity then the magnetic force points in the opposite way, for a given magnetic field. This can't be predicted if you define a magnetic field to be in the direction of the magnetic force.
 
What an interesting question! Here are a few observations...

1. The original motivation for defining a magnetic field vector to have the direction it does, was no doubt so it matched the direction in which a compass needle (freely-pivoted magnet) pointed. Ampère showed that a plane current loop would orientate itself with its normal in the same direction as the compass needle pointed.

2. We can show that forces at right angles to the conductor forming the loop, all round the loop, give rise to a couple which will tend to orientate the loop just as stated in 1.

3. Special relativity gives a huge insight. I love the thought-experiment of two parallel wires (1 and 2) carrying currents in the same direction. In a frame of reference moving with the drift velocity, v, of the charge-carriers in 1, these charge carriers experience a purely E-field force from wire 2 (charge-carriers and fixed charges). Using simple relativistic ideas of time dilation and length contraction between frames, and not using the notion of B fields at all, we can show that (in the lab frame) wire 2 experiences a net force F proportional to v, attracting it to wire 1. And this force is equal to the magnetic force as conventionally calculated between parallel current-carrying wires!

Seen this way, the direction of the force on wire 1 is not in the least surprising.

[The thought experiment illustrates the key idea that an electromagnetic field has different electric field and magnetic field parts to it, depending on our reference frame.]
 
All this is very nicely described in "The Feynman Lectures" vol. 2.
 
Hello,
Philip the nr.3 example is the BEST one could refer to in order to explain the magnetic force concept:)
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...

Similar threads

Back
Top