Magnetic Field: Inside & Outside Current Carrying Wire

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the differences in magnetic fields inside and outside a current-carrying wire, emphasizing that the field inside is determined by the enclosed current, which is a fraction of the total current based on the area ratio of the circular loop to the wire's cross-section. The magnetic field inside the wire is given by B = μoIr^2/2πR^2, while outside it is B = μoI/2πR. This distinction arises because the current is assumed to be uniformly distributed across the wire's cross-section. The use of Ampere's Law requires understanding how much current is enclosed by a loop of radius r, which is less than the wire's radius R. The discussion also notes that if the current varies with radius, integration over the cross-sectional area would be necessary.
dontwannatellyou
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi
My question is about magnetic field I mean I know where their formulas are derived from amperes law but I didnt really understand why and how there's is a difference in magnetic fields outside and inside a crrent carrying wire
the field inside a current carrying wire is B = μoIr^2/2πR^2
the field outside a current carrying wire is B =μoI/2πR
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dontwannatellyou said:
Hi
My question is about magnetic field I mean I know where their formulas are derived from amperes law but I didnt really understand why and how there's is a difference in magnetic fields outside and inside a crrent carrying wire
the field inside a current carrying wire is B = μoIr^2/2πR^2
the field outside a current carrying wire is B =μoI/2πR

Usually, when someone is at the stage of doing magnetic field, that person should have already done problems in electric field, especially in the use of Gauss's Law.

I will assume that you have, because I'm going to ask you something similar to your problem. If you have a sphere with a uniform charge, haven't you seen the difference between the expression for the E-field inside the sphere and outside the sphere?

Zz.
 
The difference in the two answers you provided is the result of a fundamental assumption about how current flows through a wire. The problem you're dealing with here assumes that the current is evenly distributed over the wire's cross section. When you use Ampere's Law inside of the wire, you are looking to find how much of the total current (I) is enclosed by your circular loop which has a radius (r), which is less than the radius of the wire (R). Any current outside of this loop (which has a radius less than that of the wire) is not "enclosed" and does not contribute.

To do this, you take the ratio between the area enclosed by the loop and the wire's cross sectional area and multiply it by the total current. I(enclosed) = I(total) x [(pi*r^2)/(pi*R^2)]. This expression for I(enclosed) is what you put into Ampere's Law. If the current is not constant and is some function of r, you would have to integrate the given expression over the cross sectional area (from r = 0, to some value r=r).

REMEMBER, you can only use the ratio of the areas to find the enclosed current because the current has no r dependence (s if you are in cylindrical coordinates).

Also, the expression you gave for the magnetic field inside the wire is almost correct... When you use the expression for I(enclosed) we found earlier, you will find that a small r cancels from your expression of Ampere's Law: B (2*pi*r) = [I(total) x (pi*r^2)/(pi*R^2)] (μ0). Here the pi's cancel and the r^2 is reduced to a single r in the numerator.
 
I was using the Smith chart to determine the input impedance of a transmission line that has a reflection from the load. One can do this if one knows the characteristic impedance Zo, the degree of mismatch of the load ZL and the length of the transmission line in wavelengths. However, my question is: Consider the input impedance of a wave which appears back at the source after reflection from the load and has traveled for some fraction of a wavelength. The impedance of this wave as it...
Back
Top