Magnetic Field of Rectangular Loop: Solving for P Far Away

stunner5000pt
Messages
1,443
Reaction score
4
CXosnider a rectangular loop carrying a current i as shown in teh figure. Point P is located a distance x from the cneter of the loop. Find an epxression for tha mgnetic field at P due to the current loop assuming that P is very far away.
WIth \mu = iA = iab obtain an expression similar to that of a circular looop which is B = \frac{\mu_{0} \mu}{2 \pi x^3}
for the field due to a distant dipole at points in the plane of the loop (perpendicular to the axis.)
Hint: Opposite sides can we treated together but consider carefully the direction of B due to each side

Well
for vertical sides (sides of length b) the magnetic field due to them both is zero because of the right rule, their magnetic field are in opposite directions and equal (equal becuase x >> a/2)

for the hirzontal sides however, the same doesn't not apply, the magnetic field is not zero since due to them both th magnetic field points out of the page.

not since x is big am i right in assuming taht \sqrt{x^2 + \frac{b^2}{4}} \approx x ??
in that case
B = \frac{2 \mu_{0} i}{2 \pi x} = \frac{\mu_{0} i}{\pi x}
is this right?

im not sure ho to proced with teh second part of the quesiton..
 

Attachments

  • charge.JPG
    charge.JPG
    7.9 KB · Views: 493
Physics news on Phys.org
The contributions from the vertical sides don't exactly cancel and for the horizontal sides you left out a geometric factor (vector cross product in Biot-Savart).
 
i understnad taht that is true... but can't i do the approximation ??

for the vertical pieces of wire ..
well for 2 pieces of wire
B = 2 \frac{\mu_{0} i}{4 \pi} \int \frac{ds \times x}{x^3}
here s is constant and r is constant

B = 2 \frac{\mu_{0} i b}{4 \pi x^2} is that correct?
 
Last edited:
You can do an approximation but just not the one you're attempting!

Biot-Savart will involve integrals over the length of each side of quantities like

\frac {d\vec l \times \vec r}{r^2}

E.g., the right side is a/2 units from the center so that \vec r = (x-a/2)\hat i + y \hat j where y is the vertical coordinate (the variable you will integrate over). Also, d\vec l = dy \hat j so you can form the vector cross product d\vec l \times \vec r. You'll integrate this (vector) from y = -b/2 to +b/2. Notice that r^2 = (x-a/2)^2 + y^2

Similarly, for the left side \vec r = (x+a/2)\hat i + y \hat j. In this case, r^2 = (x + a/2)^2 + y^2. The two integrals (from left side and right side) do not cancel out.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top