Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

B Magnetic field strength for circular loop

  1. May 5, 2016 #1
    When deriving the magnetic field strength due to a circular loop at some distance away from it's center (using Biot-Savart's law), why is the angle between ds and r 90 degrees?

    This is a youtube video with the derivation, see 5:55
     
  2. jcsd
  3. May 5, 2016 #2

    BvU

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    ##\vec {dl}## is in the ##yz## plane. As drawn it is in the negative ##y## direction, so that ##\vec {dl} \perp \vec r## for the ##r## in the ##xz## plane. From Pythagoras you have ##R^2 + x^2 = r^2##. All ##\vec r## have the same length (from symmetry - rotation around the x-axis) - so this ##R^2 + x^2 = r^2## is true for all ##\vec r## -- so all these are rectangular triangles
     
  4. May 5, 2016 #3

    Hesch

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    The 90 degrees comes from the cross product in Biot-Savart's law.

    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRON33tiq2s6fV0t1bSr3vau3hjKA34sHpOjW5YhE1z0ZBVNigw.png
     
  5. May 5, 2016 #4

    BvU

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    @Hesch: I would say the 90 degrees is used to simplify ##\vec a\times\vec b## to ##|\vec a||\vec b|## in BS, not that it comes from BS.
     
  6. May 5, 2016 #5
    r is not pointing straight out of the yz plane, so why is it perpendicular?
     
  7. May 5, 2016 #6

    BvU

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    The ##\vec r## as drawn in the picture is in the xz plane. The ##\vec {dl}## as drawn is perpendicular to the xz plane: it is in the negative y direction. So that ##\vec {dl}## is perpendicular to that ##\vec r##.
    For all other ##\vec {dl}## (in the yz plane) you can see they are ##\perp## 'their' ##\vec R## and also ##\perp## to the x-axis, so ##\perp## the plane in which their ##\vec R##, the x-axis and also ##\vec r##.

    Bringing in Pythagoras was unnecessary - a mistake on my part.
     
  8. May 5, 2016 #7

    Hesch

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Sorry, maybe it's a danish term.
    Try to write something in danish to me. Maybe I will comment it. :wink:
     
  9. May 5, 2016 #8
    So just because yz is perpendicular to xz? There is no way dl is perpendicular to r because r extends from the yz plane down to xy, making an angle that is not 90 degrees.
     
  10. May 6, 2016 #9

    BvU

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    No, not just because yz ##\perp## xz. Because ##\hat y \perp## xz for the situation as drwn in the video. In general:

    Point P goes around the ring. At all such P $$ \vec {dl}\perp \vec R \quad \& \quad \hat x \perp \vec {dl} \quad \Rightarrow \quad \vec {dl}\perp (\vec x - \vec R) = \vec r $$

    upload_2016-5-6_12-55-15.png

    Hesch: jeg forstar lidt Dansk
     

    Attached Files:

  11. May 6, 2016 #10
    I lost you at dl perpendicular to x - R, why did you do that? And why is it equal to r?
     
  12. May 6, 2016 #11

    BvU

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    dl is perpendicular to ##\vec R##
    dl is perpendicular to ##\hat x## so dl is perpendicular to ##\vec x##
    that means dl is perpendicular to the plane in which both ##\vec R## and ##\vec x## lie.
    That plane is described by ##a\vec x + b \vec R##.
    The vector ##\vec r## is ##\vec R -\vec x## so it is in that plane.
    Why is ##\vec r=\vec x -\vec R## ?
    i don't know how to say that. Perhaps a picture helps ?

    upload_2016-5-6_22-46-10.png
     

    Attached Files:

  13. May 6, 2016 #12
    Okay, I see where x - R comes from.

    So this is how I'm comprehending it:
    dl is pointing outwards (imagine a wire pointing out), so any r from its surface is perpendicular to it.
    Before, I was confusing dl with the z vector. The angle that r makes with z will not be perpendicular.
     
  14. May 7, 2016 #13

    vanhees71

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    2016 Award

    I think the reason is that they look for field only along the ##z## axis. I guess there the integral can be solved analytically, while the field of the current-conducting circular loop at an arbitrary position leads to elliptic integrals.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Magnetic field strength for circular loop
Loading...