Magnetic flux between 2 parallel wires

In summary, there is a problem regarding the calculation of magnetic flux through a section of length l between two parallel wires carrying current I in opposite directions. The provided solution suggests calculating the flux due to one wire and doubling it, while the writer's own approach involves calculating the magnetic field strength due to both wires and then doubling the result. However, after reevaluating the integrals, it is found that both approaches ultimately lead to the same solution.
  • #1
lowea001
29
3

Homework Statement


Consider two long parallel wires each of radius a with a separation distance d between them. They carry current I in opposite directions. Calculate the magnetic flux through a section of length l, ignoring magnetic field inside the wires.

My confusion lies in trying to reconcile two different approaches to solving this problem. The solution provided takes the following approach: calculate the flux due to one wire in this area and then just double it i.e. take the line integral from a to d - a of the magnetic field and multiply by l (and then double this value). My own approach was to calculate the strength of the magnetic field due to both wires at a distance r, take the line integral from a to d/2, multiply the value by l (and then double this value). However, I cannot get the same solution by doing this.

Their solution: [tex]\Phi_b = \frac{\mu_o l I}{\pi}ln\left(\frac{d-a}{a}\right)[/tex]
My solution: [tex]\Phi_b = \frac{\mu_o lI}{\pi}ln\left(\frac{d^2}{4a(d-a)}\right)[/tex]

Homework Equations


For a long wire carrying current I, [itex]B = \frac{\mu_o I}{2\pi r}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution


Their solution: [tex]\Phi_b = 2 \times \frac{\mu_o lI}{2\pi}\int_{a}^{d-a}\frac{1}{r}dr = \frac{\mu_o lI}{\pi}ln\left(\frac{d-a}{a}\right)[/tex]
My solution: [tex]\Phi_b = 2 \times \frac{\mu_o lI}{2\pi}\int_{a}^{d/2}\left(\frac{1}{r}+\frac{1}{d-r}\right)dr = \frac{\mu_o lI}{\pi}ln\left(\frac{d^2}{4a(d-a)}\right)[/tex]

I apologize in advance if this is a trivial maths error on my part, but I'm hoping that I am correct in my intuition that these two approaches should give the same result.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Haha five seconds after posting this I found my own mistake but I have decided to leave this up here as a demonstration of how the approaches eventually correspond to the same answer: my mistake was in evaluating the integral [itex]\int_{a}^{d/2}\left(\frac{1}{r}+\frac{1}{d-r}\right)dr = ln\left(\frac{d}{2a}\right) + \left(-ln\left(\frac{d}{2(d-a)}\right)\right)=ln\left(\frac{d-a}{a}\right)[/itex], as expected. I missed the negative sign in evaluating the integral of [itex]\frac{1}{d-r}[/itex], whoops.
 
Back
Top