Magnetic forces and many poles

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the concept of a magnet shaped like a half tunnel with two edges at both the north and south poles. The idea raises questions about whether the edges would repel each other due to their similar polarities and what forces could counteract this repulsion. It is noted that energy is required to push the magnets together, and when they separate, the energy returned is less due to friction, highlighting the principle of conservation of energy. Clarification is sought regarding the shape and its implications for energy work. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the limitations of energy output in relation to input when manipulating magnetic forces.
mustafallica
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
i had this idea of a magnet, if u bend the magnet, so that it has 2 edges on the north pole and 2 edges on the south pole, just like half a tunnel, i don't know the name of the shape, but suppose it has 2 edges on the north pole, won't the 2 edges repel each other because they are positive, what forces act against the repelsion force, can we use that force to do work or energy.
thanks

btw when i meant 2 edges its just like a U Magnet but in a shape of cylinder-half a tunnel-
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. It takes x amount of energy to push the magnets together and you get x when the fly apart. Actually, you get less than x because of friction. Sorry, conservation of energy.
 
i didnt quiet get you!m its just one magnet
 
I don't understand the shape you are describing, but in any case, you can't get more work out than the work you put into bend the magnet into that shape.
 
oh, yeh i think i get the idea, anyways i'll try to get the name of the shape or picture it for u, thanks anyways
 
Susskind (in The Theoretical Minimum, volume 1, pages 203-205) writes the Lagrangian for the magnetic field as ##L=\frac m 2(\dot x^2+\dot y^2 + \dot z^2)+ \frac e c (\dot x A_x +\dot y A_y +\dot z A_z)## and then calculates ##\dot p_x =ma_x + \frac e c \frac d {dt} A_x=ma_x + \frac e c(\frac {\partial A_x} {\partial x}\dot x + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial y}\dot y + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial z}\dot z)##. I have problems with the last step. I might have written ##\frac {dA_x} {dt}...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
Back
Top