Magnetic Monopoles: Size, Quantization, and Existence in Space

Rothiemurchus
Messages
203
Reaction score
1
What is the size of the smallest magnetic charge a magnetic monopole can have? And why are magnetic charges quantized inversely to electric charges?
Also,can two oppositely charged magnetic monopoles exist as dipoles like for example + -.And what wavelength of radiation would such a dipole absorb?
How do monopoles cancel out the galactic magnetic field (if monopoles existed in large numbers,apparently,this would happen.A magnetic dipole of the type I have mentioned would not cancel out a magnetic field,would it)?
And why is it generally considered that there would be monopoles in space and not dipoles (electric charges tend to stay togther)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Magnetic monopoles are looked at as being point particles in QFT. Like i stated before, for example in the dual abelian Higgsmodell, they are used in order to describe the dual analogon of the Meissner-effect that pushes the magnetic field lines out of a superconductive specimen...The actual charge of such a monopole is determined in those points of the space-time where the gauge of the field theory is undetermined. This means, where this gauge becomes singular...

regards
marlon
 
Last edited:
I attached a document i which i answer to your question of quantization of magnetic charge. The reason for this phenomenon is the Dirac-quantization which makes sure that the Dirac string is not noticable when you pass through a surface that is subtended by a deformed world-line

regards
marlon
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Back
Top