Magnetism & Energy: Unraveling the Mystery

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ndenison
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Magnetism
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of energy transfer in magnetic interactions, specifically focusing on the behavior of a metallic object accelerating towards a fixed permanent magnet. Participants explore concepts related to kinetic and potential energy, the role of magnetic fields, and the implications of energy conservation in these contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question where the kinetic energy of a metallic object comes from as it accelerates towards a permanent magnet, suggesting that the magnet may possess infinite potential energy.
  • Others argue that all magnetic fields are electromagnetic in nature and that magnets do not have infinite potential energy, as they exert a finite force.
  • A participant mentions that when a ferromagnetic object is placed in a magnetic field, the external field is reduced, implying that energy is expended in this process.
  • One participant draws an analogy between magnetic and gravitational forces, suggesting that potential energy is converted into kinetic energy as an object moves towards a magnet or a star.
  • Questions arise regarding the behavior of diamagnetic superconductors, specifically about the energy source when they levitate above a magnet after being cooled below their critical temperature.
  • Another participant suggests that the energy for the levitation of a diamagnetic superconductor comes from the cooling process itself.
  • One participant emphasizes that energy is expended when placing an object in the magnetic field, which gives it potential energy that is converted into kinetic energy as it moves.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views regarding the source of energy in magnetic interactions, with some agreeing on the conversion of potential energy to kinetic energy, while others contest the idea of infinite potential energy and the nature of magnetic fields. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the assumptions made about energy sources and the definitions of magnetic fields, which may affect the interpretations of energy transfer in this context.

ndenison
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
This is something I can't get my head around, and hopefully someone here could help.

Say you have a fixed permanent magnet (not an electromagnet), and you place a metallic object with mass nearby. The object will begin to accelerate toward the magnet due to magnetic force. At the moment before impact with the magnet, the object has an instantaneous velocity greater than zero, meaning that it has kinetic energy. Where does that energy come from? I know magnets don't "deplete" the more they are used, so would that mean that a magnet has infinite potential energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ndenison said:
This is something I can't get my head around, and hopefully someone here could help.

Say you have a fixed permanent magnet (not an electromagnet)

aren't all magnetic fields , electrical fields, and therefore there is no magnet that's not elctromagnetic? Oh and they would not have infinite potential energy, becaue the magnet hit at a certain force which is not infinity and yes they do have a kinetic energy but i tjhink that energy doesn't have enough force to break between the magnets
this is because:
picture 2 magnets one + and one -, picture no ther force at work but Newton's lawas of motion (meaning no gravity) and the laws that govern electromagnetics. Picture the magnets headed toward each other at the same force (note this was the exact sam emass and sape the magnets) since each weigh x, their kinetic energy is deposited and instead of moving backward, they move forward due to the magnets agian pulling each other ofter the potential energy taking place.
 
Last edited:
ndenison said:
Where does that energy come from? I know magnets don't "deplete" the more they are used, so would that mean that a magnet has infinite potential energy?
There is http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/indeng.html#c2" itself. When a ferromagnetic object is in a magnetic field the external field is reduced. This reduced field implies reduced energy, which is equal to the work done on the object.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Welcome to PF!

ndenison said:
Say you have a fixed permanent magnet (not an electromagnet), and you place a metallic object with mass nearby. The object will begin to accelerate toward the magnet due to magnetic force. At the moment before impact with the magnet, the object has an instantaneous velocity greater than zero, meaning that it has kinetic energy. Where does that energy come from? I know magnets don't "deplete" the more they are used, so would that mean that a magnet has infinite potential energy?

Hi ndenison! Welcome to PF! :smile:

As DaleSpam says, there is energy in the magnetic field itself.

It's the same as gravity …

place an object near a star … it will begin to accelerate toward the star due to gravitational force … but the star doesn't have any less gravity … so where does that kinetic energy come from? :confused:

It comes from depleting the potential energy (either gravitational or magnetic). :smile:
 
what about a diamagnetic superconductor? where does the energy come from when you cool it below its critical temp and it levitates off the magnet it was sitting on?
 
granpa said:
what about a diamagnetic superconductor? where does the energy come from when you cool it below its critical temp and it levitates off the magnet it was sitting on?

It comes from cooling it below its critical temperature. :wink:
 
ndenison said:
This is something I can't get my head around, and hopefully someone here could help.

Say you have a fixed permanent magnet (not an electromagnet), and you place a metallic object with mass nearby. The object will begin to accelerate toward the magnet due to magnetic force. At the moment before impact with the magnet, the object has an instantaneous velocity greater than zero, meaning that it has kinetic energy. Where does that energy come from? I know magnets don't "deplete" the more they are used, so would that mean that a magnet has infinite potential energy?

You just need to look at what you wrote: “you place a metallic object with mass nearby.” You expend energy when you place the object in the field which gives the object potential energy. When it moves it is translating that potential energy into kinetic energy, and when it finally hits the magnet the kinetic energy is translated into heat energy. All of that energy came from the bag of peanuts you ate before placing the object in the field.:smile:
 
mmm … peanuts!

schroder said:
All of that energy came from the bag of peanuts you ate before placing the object in the field.:smile:

:smile::smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K