Magnetize water with external electromagnetic field

AI Thread Summary
Creating an external electromagnetic field to move iron shavings in water is challenging and may require higher voltages, potentially up to 100 volts or more. Using AC current instead of DC might yield better results. Additionally, employing a neodymium magnet can effectively move iron shavings without the need for high voltage. The current setup may not be sufficient, and exploring these alternatives could lead to success. Experimenting with these suggestions is recommended for achieving the desired effect.
walela1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have created an external electromagnetic field by using DC current connected to magnetic wire that is wrapped around a small test tube. I put water in the test tube. I have increased/decreased the gauge of the wire, increased the volts of the DC current, tried AC current and I still cannot get the test tube of water to move iron shavings. It of course works fine when I put an iron rod in the test tube. Is what I am trying to do impossible? Do I just need to continue to increase the power of the electromagnetic field? If yes, to what? I am currently at 34 volts. Or if I am going about this the wrong way, can you suggest another way for me to try.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It is possible to move iron shavings with an external electromagnetic field. However, it is typically difficult and requires a much higher voltage than what you have tried. You may need to increase the voltage up to 100 volts or more. Additionally, you may need to use an AC current instead of DC. Another approach you could take is to use a neodymium magnet. This type of magnet is much stronger than a simple electromagnet, and can be used to move the iron shavings without the need for a high voltage current.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top