Magnetostatics Anomalie: Infinite Surface Currents

  • Thread starter Thread starter Void123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conceptual
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the magnetic field generated by infinite sheets of surface current in magnetostatics. It highlights that while there is no x-component of the magnetic field, the absence of a z-component is due to the cancellation of contributions from adjacent currents. The argument presented references Griffiths, explaining that the direction of the current does not influence the vertical component, leading to overall cancellation. The concept is illustrated using point source currents, where the superposition of fields from these sources results in the z-components negating each other. This reasoning parallels the behavior of a current-carrying ring, which also produces a magnetic field directed only along its axis.
Void123
Messages
138
Reaction score
0
I have been looking at a problem in magnetostatics about sheets of infinite surface current, positioned along the xy plane. Now clearly there is an Amperian loop parallel to the yz-plane. I understand why there would be no x component of the magnetic field, but I don't understand why there would be no z (vertical) component. According to Griffiths, they 'cancel out' or through a clever argument he uses: the direction of the current cannot affect the vertical component. Either way, I don't understand the logic at work here.

Would appreciate some feedback.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The basic source of a magnetic field is a dipole. So a point source current is going to create a dipole magnetic field, whose field lines look like dees. So if the point source is at the origin pointing in the z direction, then the magnetic field in the x-y plane will point along the z direction too. Only for z =\= 0 will the field have an x and/or y component.

So conceptually you can visualize the current sheet as an infinite superposition of these point source currents. If we have two point sources located one behind the other, say:

Code:
^
|

^
|

Then the fields will be something like:

Code:
   ___
 /      \       
|       |     
|       |       
|       |     +          _____
 \_____ /               /      \       
                       |       |     
                       |       |       
                       |       |     
                        \_____/     

 =

  _____
 /      \       
|       |     
|       |       
|       |          
|       |     
|       |       
|       |     
 \_____/
The dees are offset slightly along the direction of the current (not in the normal direction asI have done above). This means that the components near the ends of the dees cancel each other out. If this occurs over an infinite sheet, the adjacent currents will cancel out all the z components. It is similar to why a ring of current's magnetic field along the ring's axis is only in the axial direction.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
Back
Top