Magnetostatics - boundary condition

AI Thread Summary
In magnetostatics, the boundary condition for the magnetic vector potential \(\vec{A}\) at the interface of two media with permeabilities \(\mu_1\) and \(\mu_2\) states that only the normal component of \(\vec{A}\) is continuous, while the tangential component is continuous only if the magnetization \(\vec{M}\) is normal to the surface. The conditions for the magnetic field \(\vec{B}\) at the boundary include that the normal component difference is zero and a specific relationship involving the permeabilities. The discussion reveals a correction regarding the continuity of components of \(\vec{A}\), clarifying that the tangential component is continuous under certain conditions. The final consensus acknowledges the correct interpretation of these boundary conditions. Understanding these nuances is crucial for accurate applications in magnetostatics.
paweld
Messages
253
Reaction score
0
Let's consider two media with magnetic permeability \mu_1, \mu_2.
What's the condition for magnetostatic vector potential \vec{A}
on the boundary. Is it true that its tangent component should be continuous.
Thanks for replay.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The BC across the magnetic interface is

\vec{A_+} - \vec{A_-}=\mu_0\vec{M}\times\hat{n}

so only the normal component of A is continuous. A_tangential is continuous only in the special case when M is normal to the surface.
 
I don't see your point.
The condition on \vec{B} are the following:
\vec{n}( \vec{B}^+ - \vec{B}^-) = 0
and
\vec{n} \times (\frac{1}{\mu_1}\vec{B}^+ -\frac{1}{\mu_2} \vec{B}^-) = 0
Vector potential satisfies the condition \nabla \times \vec{A} = \vec{B}.
I'm exacly asking if the above conditions implies that some components of A are continous.
 
I don't agree with Marcus. Since curl A is finite, A tangential is continuous.
Since div A is zero, A normal is continuous.
 
Clem is right, I am wrong. Please disregard my post above.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top