Magnetostatics: Proof for θi, μ1, μ2, and μ3

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a homework problem involving magnetic flux in a three-layer geometry with different permeabilities. The user initially struggles with proving that the angle θo is independent of μ2 and that θo equals θi when μ1 equals μ3. They note that since the media are non-conducting, surface currents at the boundaries are zero, leading to specific relationships between the magnetic fields in different regions. After some attempts, the user successfully solves the problem and expresses gratitude for any assistance received. The thread highlights the complexities of magnetostatics in layered media and the importance of understanding boundary conditions.
satchmo05
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
[PLAIN]http://img714.imageshack.us/img714/2757/96034584.png

Homework Statement



In the image above, magnetic flux enters the first interface of a three-layer geometry at an angle θi. If all three media are non-conducting and have permeabilities μ1, μ2, and μ3.
a.) show that the angle θo is independent of the value of μ2.
b.) show that θo = θi, when μ1 = μ3.

Homework Equations



1.) B1N = B2N
2.) (1/μ1)B1T - (μ2)B2T = Js

The Attempt at a Solution



Right off the bat, I know that since the media are non-conducting, that the surface currents at the boundaries are 0. Therefore, (1/μ1)B1T =(1/μ2)B2T. Using formula #2, I can plug in values for both regions 1 and 2, and I can do the same for regions 2 and 3, but then when comparing regions 1 and 3, that is where it gets tricky because following the same form as the standard regions, the θ in region 2 when comparing regions 2 and 3 would be equal to (90-θ). What I end up determining is θo = sin-1((μ11)(B1sinθi)/(B3tanθ). As you can see, this form for θo doesn't really help me much for part b.)

If anyone can give me a word of advice or a path to start on that will lead me to the right answer, I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you much!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I solved the problem. Thanks for those who attempted.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top