Making Buffers with pHs of 4.2, 7.3, 9.7

  • Thread starter Thread starter coryvett06
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Buffer
AI Thread Summary
To create buffers with pHs of 4.2, 7.3, and 9.7, different methods must be employed for each, utilizing distinct conjugate acid-base pairs. For the pH 4.2 buffer, the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation can be applied, but a different approach is necessary for the other two buffers. It is essential to select appropriate conjugate pairs for each pH level to meet the requirements of buffer preparation. The discussion emphasizes the importance of not reusing methods across the different buffers. Overall, a clear understanding of buffer chemistry and the selection of suitable conjugate pairs is crucial for successful buffer preparation.
coryvett06
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have a Question that I cannot figure out:

Describe how to make a buffer with pHs of 4.2, 7.3, and 9.7. For each buffer, you will need to choose a different method. For ex., if you make a buffer using a conjugate pair, you cannot reuse this method for the other 2 buffers...

I just don't know where to go w/ it?? I've used pH=pKa + log (base/acid) for the 4.2 buffer and am just stuck...

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I think what they mean is that you have to use different conjugate pairs, buffer by definition contains conjugate pair, so you can't make one without one :wink:

Please don't reuse old therads to ask new questions.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top