Making resonance using simulated inductor (op amp)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around designing a circuit that can effectively amplify a 10kHz sound input using a simulated inductor and a band-pass filter. Participants explore various circuit design options, including the use of op-amps and different types of capacitors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using a simulated inductor to create a resonance circuit for amplifying a microphone output at 10kHz, questioning its effectiveness.
  • Another participant indicates that a virtual inductor can work but notes that one end is effectively grounded, which may limit design options.
  • Some participants propose using a high-Q band-pass filter as an alternative to a simulated inductor, referencing the Sallen-Key topology.
  • Discussion includes the potential use of old telephones as sources for actual inductors, with one participant sharing personal experience with biquad filters and their effectiveness at higher frequencies.
  • There is a suggestion to understand biquad filters, which can simulate inductors, even if not used directly in the design.
  • A participant raises a question about the appropriateness of using electrolytic capacitors in a Sallen-Key filter, leading to a discussion about capacitor types and their characteristics.
  • Concerns are expressed regarding the tolerances of electrolytic capacitors and their suitability for precise frequency applications.
  • Recommendations for sourcing components include looking for electronic surplus and salvaging parts from old equipment.
  • One participant mentions the limitations of gyrators in terms of Q factor and suggests alternative configurations using BJTs.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that a band-pass filter is a suitable approach for the problem at hand. However, there are differing opinions on the use of simulated inductors versus traditional inductors and the types of capacitors that should be used in the circuit.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the specific design requirements, such as the need for capacitor values and the implications of using different types of capacitors. The discussion does not resolve the best approach to take regarding the use of simulated inductors versus traditional components.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for electronics enthusiasts, students working on circuit design, and individuals interested in audio signal processing and filtering techniques.

Curl
Messages
756
Reaction score
0
Making resonance using "simulated inductor" (op amp)

I want to have a circuit that responds strongly (gives me a good measurable voltage) to a 10kHz sound input. To do this, I thought about hooking up a microphone and making a resonance circuit (using inductor and capacitor) to amplify the microphone output ONLY at 10kHz (simply hooking up the microphone to an op-amp did not work because of poor signal/noise ratio).

The problem is, finding the right inductor is not easy, so I thought about using a "simulated" inductor:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gyrator#Application:_a_simulated_inductor

So my question is, will this work? I don't know if this fake inductor can do the job in this case, so I'm looking for advice. Thank you!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
There is no reason why it shouldn't work, provided you realize that one end of the virtual inductor is effectively grounded. That limits your circuit design options a bit.

On the other hand, maybe a high-Q bandpass filter would do the job just as well: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sallen–Key_topology#Application:_Bandpass_filter
You can find component value calculators for Sallen & Key filters on the web.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Very early touch-tone telephones had actual inductors inside; one from a thrift shop would be a source . You can identify those phones easily - they weigh two or three times more than all electronic ones. There'd be an element of nostalgia to that approach.But, Yes, a filter of some sort seems very natural.

I have used the biquad filter in this datasheet with good results at around 25khz, Q around 50.
It should do fine if you don't mind old school design.

See figure 52 here:
http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/lm359.pdf

pretty sure i built the type1, single supply probably 5 volts - it was about twenty years ago.

I used 5% resistors but hand selected them to match one another and fine-tuned the filter with a frequency generator.
old jim
 
ALephZero is right. What you want is a band-pass filter (the highest Q the better). Read up on them. You can implement them with R, L, C passives, with opamps, Rs, and Cs, or buy them prepackaged.

Getting an old radio or phone and harvesting passives could be fun too. Or you could just design an LC ladder filter (look it up) and buy the passives from Digi-Key or something.
 
Thanks guys, you are right that a band-pass filter is what I should use for my situation.

Here's a dumb question, but for the Sallen-Key type filter, I cannot use electrolytic capacitors correct? Should I buy the thin-film caps for this purpose?
 
You can't use polarized capacitors, for the obvious reason. You could use non-polarized electrolytic caps.

But for a 10 kHz frequency, I'm surprised you need capacitor values big enough to be even thinking about electrolytics, if you use sensible resistor values, i.e. in the 10K to 100K range.

In any case, if you want accurate frequencies, electrolytics often have HUGE tolerances (like +100% -20% of the nominal value)
 
Look for electronic surplus. I found, at my metal recycle yard, an old telephone exchange. I got several boards chock full of 1% capacitors, and they had leads long enough to salvage.

Aleph is right about electrolytics. They're most often used for filter capacitors where 'more' is almost always 'better'.

You'll want some sort of film. Some ceramics have a hefty temperature coefficient, so read the datasheet carefully.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Film capacitors. Polyester for cheap and compact through holes. Polysulfone for surface mount.
Gyrators are okay, but their Q is limited by their feedback resistor. It's difficult to set the resistor less than about 30 ohms and still get stable performance.
For a bit of fun, you can use your common BJT as an emitter follower to replace the op amp.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K