MHB Man on ladder wishes to avoid the ladder slipping

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joe_1234
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Slipping
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the coefficient of friction required to prevent a ladder from slipping while a man climbs it. The ladder, weighing 350N and positioned at a 30° angle, must support an additional weight of 900N from the man. Participants are analyzing the forces acting on the ladder, including friction between the floor and the ladder, as well as friction between the wall and the ladder, which is noted to be 0.20. The equilibrium conditions are established with the equations for forces and torque. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the direction of wall friction in this scenario.
Joe_1234
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
A 6 m ladder weighs 350N and is placed with its lower end on a horizontal floor and its upper end against the wall. The angle between the wall and the ladder is 30°. A man weighing 900N is to climb to the very top of the ladder. The coefficient of friction between the floor and the ladder to avoid the danger of slipping is?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Can you show what you have so far so we know where you're stuck?
 
I have this diagram, but I'm not sure about this 900 N, on top of the ladder already?
 
$\sum F_x = 0$, $\sum F_y = 0$, and $\sum \tau = 0$

EC3D7510-DF2D-4271-A829-2C81102E0BDA.jpeg
 
skeeter said:
$\sum F_x = 0$, $\sum F_y = 0$, and $\sum \tau = 0$

View attachment 10283
I forgot there is friction between the wall and the
skeeter said:
$\sum F_x = 0$, $\sum F_y = 0$, and $\sum \tau = 0$

View attachment 10283
I forgot there is a friction between the wall and the ladder which is 0.20
 
Joe_1234 said:
I forgot there is a friction between the wall and the ladder which is 0.20

Which direction do you think the wall friction acts on the ladder?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top