Mapping Elements in Quotient Group G/N to Isomorphism f:G/N--H

  • Thread starter Thread starter Phred Willard
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mapping
Phred Willard
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Can an element of a quotient group G/N in an isomorphism f:G/N--H map back onto itself if it does not have a corresponding element in H? The example I am looking at is the quotient group of the group of symmetries of an n-gon, G, where n is an even number and N equal to the normal subgroup containing the identity and a 180 rotation. H represents another n-gon with an even n, but is less than the order of G.

I have found that the quotient group G/N contains every permutation in G (which I think is incorrect) because for f to be an isomorphism, G contains rotations that don't map to H.

What's going on here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Phred Willard said:
Can an element of a quotient group G/N in an isomorphism f:G/N--H map back onto itself if it does not have a corresponding element in H? The example I am looking at is the quotient group of the group of symmetries of an n-gon, G, where n is an even number and N equal to the normal subgroup containing the identity and a 180 rotation. H represents another n-gon with an even n, but is less than the order of G.

I have found that the quotient group G/N contains every permutation in G (which I think is incorrect) because for f to be an isomorphism, G contains rotations that don't map to H.

What's going on here?

Are you referring to one of the isomorphism theorems?

Let's do a small example, with the dihedral group D_4 (the group of symmetries of a square). The 8 elements are \{ e, h, v, d_1, d_2, r_{90}, r_{180}, r_{270} \}. If N=\{ e, r_{180} \} then what are the elements of D_4/N? (From Lagrange's theorem, we expect only 4 elements in this group.)

eN = r_{180}N = N
vN = hN = \{ h, v \}
d_1N = d_2N = \{ d_1, d_2 \}
r_{90}N = r_{270}N = \{ r_{90}, r_{270} \}

Notice that the elements of D_4/N are essentially _cosets_ of N; so I am not sure what you mean by "G/N contains every permutation."
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
448
Replies
13
Views
583
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top