Markov property and chemical oscillators

AI Thread Summary
Chemical oscillators in reaction systems are typically modeled as Markov processes, which are memoryless and depend solely on the current state. While Markov chains can achieve a stationary distribution under certain conditions, the presence of bulk oscillations in chemical systems raises questions about whether these systems violate the conditions for stationarity. The discussion highlights a potential discrepancy between the existence of a stationary distribution and the actual behavior of chemical oscillators, suggesting that they may still reach equilibrium over time despite oscillatory behavior. The need for further exploration into the relationship between chemical oscillators and Markov chain properties is emphasized, as current resources seem lacking. Understanding this relationship is crucial for accurately modeling and predicting the behavior of chemical reaction systems.
cjolley
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody...

I've been working a bit with models of chemical oscillators and I've run into something that isn't quite clear to me.

Chemical reaction systems are typically regarded as having the Markov property -- they lack memory and their evolution depends only on their current state. Under a not-too-restrictive set of conditions, Markov chains will have a stationary distribution: the basic requirement seems to be that any state be reachable from any other in a finite number of steps. This seems like something that will generally be true for chemical systems, at least on the lattice of stoichiometrically-compatible states.

Here's where this starts to bother me: it's also fairly easy to set up a Monte Carlo simulation of a chemical reaction system that shows bulk oscillations. Do chemical oscillators somehow violate the conditions required for Markov chain stationarity? Or am I comparing apples and oranges here? This seems like a reasonable question, but an hour or so of poking around on the internet has turned up nothing directly relevant.

Thanks!

--craig
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"There is a stationary distribution" and "everything will approach a stationary distribution" are two completely different things. In addition, I think even those chemical oscillators will approach an equilibrium after a while.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top