Mass addition due to gravitational acceleration

Anthony24
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I read an article about super massive black holes that are millions a billion times larger than our sun. In reading this article i began thinking about gravitational acceleration and what the effects would be on incoming objects. I ran through a bunch of equations and found that the mass gain would be over 100 million kg per kg at 98% the speed of light. My questions are: Does time dilation change the energy in a system K.E=.5mv^2 (as this would change mass addition), and does E=mc^2 still apply to gravitational acceleration since it is just the bending of space time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Anthony24, welcome to PF!

Energy is notoriously difficult to handle in GR, but in certain scenarios it does make sense: see http://www.phys.ncku.edu.tw/mirrors/physicsfaq/Relativity/GR/energy_gr.html

In the case of a supermassive black hole as something falls in it loses PE and gains KE so the total energy of the system is unchanged.
 
Wow thank you so much for that, i had not put together to relation between potential energy and kinetic energy in the system. That answers my question perfectly and nullifies some pages of math work :( oh well, thanks a bunch!
 
Okay if this is true then where does potential energy end and begin? It stands to reason that we also have the potential to be pulled toward any object in the universe. Would that not mean we have an infinite amount of potential energy? Please forgive my lack of familiarity with this concept.
 
The PE does not end or begin at a certain location, but because of the way that the math works it turns out to be finite anyway. It is therefore possible for an object to have more kinetic energy than potential energy, the speed corresponding to the kinetic energy which would be exactly equal to the potential energy is called escape velocity.
 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top