B Mass and space in atoms

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Itry
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding the foundational concepts of electricity and atomic theory from the book "Teach Yourself Electricity and Electronics." The initial confusion arises from the statement that all matter consists of tiny particles in constant motion, prompting a question about the scientific evidence behind this claim. It is clarified that the focus should be on how scientists developed the atomic model through the scientific method, rather than where they observed these particles. The conversation suggests exploring the history of atomic theory for a deeper understanding. This foundational knowledge is crucial for grasping more complex concepts in electricity.
Itry
Messages
1
Reaction score
2
I'm reading a book about electricity (Teach Yourself Electricity and Electronics) because I want to know more about electricity. So I started reading this book, seems well written, but right at the beginning I couldn't figure out what is meant. And so I had to stop. It's talking about atoms and says "All matter consists of countless tiny particles in constant motion." OK, while I am willing to accept that, how do scientists know this, I mean where did they see this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Itry said:
OK, while I am willing to accept that, how do scientists know this, I mean where did they see this?
It's not "where" scientists saw this but "how" scientists proceeded to develop and refine the atomic model following the scientific method of forming and validating hypotheses. You might wish to read about the history of the atomic theory here.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_atomic_theory
 
  • Like
Likes gmax137 and PeroK
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top