Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

I Mass and two springs in series: How to solve acceleration

  1. May 26, 2016 #1
    Hello!

    I have rather simple problem, but I can't find somehow answer for it: There are two springs in series, let's say spring 1 and spring 2. Springs are attached and spring 2 is attached to ground. In the beginning springs are not stretched. Let's say springs have spring constants k1 and k2.

    When mass is inserted on top of spring 1, springs start to vibrate. What is an acceleration between spring 1 and 2 as a function of time?

    Please believe me, this is not a homework but an engineering problem. My skills on basic mechanics are quite rusty :)

    I would appreciate if you could show me not only answer but how to solve this, so next time I can solve it myself. Thanks!

    -Paavo Palikka
     
  2. jcsd
  3. May 26, 2016 #2
    Have you tried to identify the forces acting on the mass? And what do you mean by acceleration between spring 1 and 2?
     
  4. May 26, 2016 #3
  5. May 27, 2016 #4

    vanhees71

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    2016 Award

    Well, let's get the Lagrangian for this setup. Let ##x## be the position of the mass and assume that ##x=0## is the equilibrium position. Let ##L_1## and ##L_2## be the springs' length in the equilibrium position. Then we have
    $$V=\frac{1}{2} [k_1 (L_1-x)^2+k_2(L_2+x)^2].$$
    Then
    $$L=T-V=\frac{m}{2} \dot{x}^2 -\frac{1}{2} [k_1 (L_1-x)^2+k_2(L_2+x)^2].$$
    The equation of motion is given by the Euler-Lagrange equation
    $$\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} t} \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{x}}=m \ddot{x}=\frac{\partial L}{\partial x}=-k_1(x-L_1)-k_2(x+L_2)=-(k_1+k_2) x -(k_2 L_2-k_1 L_1).$$
    Since by assumption for ##x=0## the force must vanish, we have ##k_1 L_1=k_2 L_2##, and thus
    $$m \ddot{x}=-(k_1+k_2) x.$$
    As you see, your setup does not reflect two springs in series but in parallel.

    You would have springs in series, if you'd not put the mass between the springs but connecting the strings and fixing the mass on one end of the combined spring and the other end at the ceiling.
     
  6. May 27, 2016 #5
    How did you infer that the mass is inbetween the springs???Ok the post isn't 100% accurate since it doesn't provide a figure or an attached image of some sort but still from what I can infer the springs are in vertical position in series with spring 1 on top and spring 2 on bottom and mass is on top of the spring system.
     
  7. May 27, 2016 #6
    Hi again!

    my question might be quite unreadable, apologies for that. Unfortunately I can't find any good picture from internet, but maybe picture below is suffisient enough.
    One should turn it 90 degrees so that ground is down and springs are vertical. g is acting on mass then vertically.
    Acceleration between strings means acceleration between these two strings on picture. Surely it is smaller than acceleration of mass, but how much smaller it is?
    I would guess that answer could be given as a function of time t, spring constants k1 and k2 and gravitation g.


    2000px-SpringsInSeries.svg.png
     
  8. May 27, 2016 #7
    You mean acceleration of the point between the two springs?
    Acceleration between springs does not make much sense. Should be acceleration of some object or even geometric point, if you wish.
     
  9. May 27, 2016 #8
    Okay, instead of going into Lagrangian let's apply Newton's laws directly but keep in mind that they are equivalent. For a series spring system the equivalent spring constant is k1k2/(k1+k2). You can derive this using the fact that the force on the two springs are equal. If you have difficulty deriving this you can check the wikipedia page posted above. So now we converted the two spring system to one spring.

    Now the forces one the mass is clearly a gravitational force and spring force. Let's call the distance of the mass from intial point x. Using Newton's second law mg-k1k2x/(k1+k2)=ma. Since a is the second derivative of x you have a differential equation. After solving this equation for x, you can obtain a by differentiating it twice.

    One extra note, you can find the x without finding equivalent k, but this time you need to define x1 and x2 for two springs and find the relationship between x1 and x2(using equal force approach) then the distance of the mass from initial point will be x1+x2. After that you need to write the new equation for the mass since the opposite force will be due to x1 but the acceleration will be second derivative of x1+x2. However you will get the same equation. Hope it helps.
     
  10. May 28, 2016 #9

    vanhees71

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    2016 Award

    Then the two springs are in series, and it's simpler to argue with forces. On both springs the same force are acting. Let again ##x## be the displacement of the mass from it's equilibrium position (then you don't need to consider the gravitational force anymore, because it's for ##x=0## exactly compensated by the springs). If ##x_j## is the change of length on spring ##j## (##j \in \{1,2 \}##) then you have
    $$x=x_1+x_2$$
    and since the forces are the same
    $$k_1 x_1=k_2 x_2.$$
    The springs together have a constant ##k##, and then you have
    $$F=k x = k (x_1+x_2)= k (x_1+k_1 x_1/k_2)=k (1+k_1/k_2) x_1=k \frac{k_1+k_2}{k_2} x_1=k_1 x_1 \; \Rightarrow \; k= \frac{k_1 k_2}{k_1+k_2}.$$
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted