Mass Expansion/Particle Accelerators

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ulnarian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
AI Thread Summary
As objects approach the speed of light, their mass appears to increase, complicating further acceleration. However, in particle accelerators, electrons are accelerated to near-light speeds without gaining enough mass to breach the accelerator walls. Instead, they gain relativistic energy, enabling them to collide with atomic nuclei and create new particles. The concept of mass increase is often represented as a gain in energy, with the same physical effects resulting from different equations. Modern accelerators are designed with safety measures, including being buried to contain any potential radiation.
Ulnarian
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Hi its me again, sorry for my ignorance of physics.

Anyways, I was reading on the net about how an objects mass increases as it approaches the speed of light thus making further acceleration rather hard.

My question is this, we have been accelerating electrons for years now and have gotten them pretty close to the speed of light in particle accelerators. What is the practicle effect of this acceleration. Why doesn't that electron gain an enormous amount of mass and burst through the walls of the particle accelerator?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The electron gains relativistically increased energy so it can smash through the electric charge of nucleii and smash them, creating new particles or by its change in energy detecting their constituents.

In some representations of relativity the relativistic gain in energy is seen as a gain in mass. The same physical effects occur, it's just that the equations are a little different.

The electrons are raised to something like a trillion electron volts of energy, but that is nowhere near enough to smash therough the walls of the experiment. Even so, these modern accelerators are buried so that radiation if it leaks out, won't hurt anybody.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top