Mass & Gravity of Photon at Light Speed

matteo16
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
for the equation m=m0/relativistic factor m is greater than m0 and about a photon which has a speed that is equal to light's one the mass would be inifinite and so the gravity would be infinity too. or maybe does that increase convert in energy?
but if so in the sun as final effect(of nuclear fusion) it woulden't have a smaller mass because, if the greater one converts in energy, tha mass keeps itselph:confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For a photon, the rest mass m0 is zero, so the equation you mention just doesn't give a well-defined answer for the relativistic mass m, it's zero divided by zero. But you can use the quantum equation E = hf to find the energy of a photon, where h is Planck's constant and f is the frequency...I suppose you could then define the relativistic mass m of the photon using the equation E = mc^2 if you wanted, in which case you'd have m = hf/c^2.

Anyway, you shouldn't assume any simple relation between relativistic mass and gravity--take a look at the question If you go too fast do you become a black hole? from the Usenet Physics FAQ.
 
i didn't understend very much
but i understood that the photon's m0 is equal to 0 but why can't i think the mass connecting with the gravity in a relativistic spacetime?
only because is relativistic?
 
ops sorry i was wrong
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top