Mass of Star HD 179949: 8.77x10^31 kg

  • Thread starter Thread starter kuahji
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbital
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the mass of the star HD 179949, which is orbited by a "hot Jupiter" planet. The initial formula used for mass calculation was T=2πr^(3/2)/√(Gm), with the orbital period T incorrectly calculated as 4.23x10^4 seconds. The correct value for T was later identified as 2.67x10^5 seconds. After correcting the calculation, the mass of the star was found to be 8.77x10^31 kg, although the initial attempt was deemed incorrect due to the miscalculation of T. The conversation highlights the importance of accurate values in astrophysical calculations.
kuahji
Messages
390
Reaction score
2
In 2004 astronomers reported the discovery of a large Jupiter-sized planet orbiting very close to the star HD 179949 (hence the term "hot Jupiter"). The orbit was just {1 \over 9} the distance of Mercury from our sun, and it takes the planet only 3.09 days to make one orbit (assumed to be circular). What is the mass of the star? Express your answer in kilograms.

Ok, so I using a formula found in the book T=2\pir^{3/2}/\sqrt{Gm}
Where r is the semi-major axis, G the gravitational constant, and m the mass of the star.

Solving for m
m=(2\pir^{3/2}/T)^2/G

From the initial problem I found T=4.23x10^4 (converting 3.09 days/rev to seconds).

The orbital radius of Mercury in back of the text is 5.79x10^10, dividing that by nine yields 6.43x10^9.

Plugging in all the quantities I get 8.77x10^31kg. However this is not the correct answer. Any ideas where I could be going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I was just using the wrong value for T, I calculated it wrong. It should have been 2.67x10^5 sorry. ^^
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top