Mass of trapped photons vs. Mass of potential energy

cephron
Messages
123
Reaction score
0
I've understood for a while that a black hole is made more massive simply by shining light on it; the energy of the photons "goes towards" (for lack of a more informed/accurate term) the mass of the black hole. Also, a couple weeks back, someone on the forums said that if one had a container lined with perfect mirrors, then photons trapped inside the container would effectively add mass to the object. If this is true, then it occurred to me that a system could conceivably change its mass by sequestering photons within itself.

Imagine the following system: two heavy masses, at rest relative to each other, are held apart by a scaffold of some kind. The scaffold has a track which will allow the masses to fall towards each other, driving an electricity generator as they go. The generator is hooked up to a lamp which shines into a really, really long perfect-mirror-container, with another perfect mirror ready to slide down in front of the lamp (to close the container). Let's say the total mass of all the components of the system is M.

When this contraption is triggered, the masses fall towards each other, the lamp shines, and the mirror snaps shut before the light returns from the far end of the container. We now have the same system, with none of its particles missing, except now we also have a perfect-mirror-container full of photons.

Is the total mass of the system still M? Or is it slightly more? If the mass is the same, then where did the mass of the trapped photons "live" before they were generated?

Thanks in advance for any input / explanation / humbling rebuke.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Still M. The energy that made the photons came from the gravity field itself. The net far-field gravity is the same though the two masses have a quadupole moment that would be different for the box of photons.
 
cephron said:
Imagine the following system: two heavy masses, at rest relative to each other, are held apart by a scaffold of some kind. The scaffold has a track which will allow the masses to fall towards each other, driving an electricity generator as they go. The generator is hooked up to a lamp which shines into a really, really long perfect-mirror-container, with another perfect mirror ready to slide down in front of the lamp (to close the container). Let's say the total mass of all the components of the system is M.

When this contraption is triggered, the masses fall towards each other, the lamp shines, and the mirror snaps shut before the light returns from the far end of the container. We now have the same system, with none of its particles missing, except now we also have a perfect-mirror-container full of photons.

Is the total mass of the system still M? Or is it slightly more? If the mass is the same, then where did the mass of the trapped photons "live" before they were generated?
The mass is the same. You should read the wikipedia article on binding energy, particularly the section on mass deficit. In this case the two masses are a more tightly bound system afterwards, so there is a mass deficit in the system. Assuming 100% efficiency everywhere that mass deficit is exactly equal to the mass gain from the photons.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top