Mass Spectrometry results question

  • Thread starter Thread starter RayTomes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on interpreting a mass spectrometry graph from Wikipedia, specifically regarding the presence of major and secondary peaks. The major peaks are attributed to the substitution of hydrogen atoms with deuterium, while the secondary peaks arise from variations in binding energy due to isotopic substitutions. A particular concern is raised about a third peak with two closely spaced peaks that differ by 0.058 amu, which seems too large to result from typical isotopic variations. The analysis suggests that such a significant difference would require multiple rare isotope substitutions, which should produce additional peaks that are not observed. Ultimately, the complexities of non-integer masses and their relative abundances contribute to the observed differences in the mass spectrum of the peptide.
RayTomes
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Looking at the graph on the page on "Mass spectrometry" in wikipedia (sorry it didn't let me post the URL), there is something that I do not understand. Easiest to start with what I do understand ...

There are 4 major peaks separated by about 1 amu. OK, so some H1 atoms were substituted by D2 atoms or something similar. That makes sense.

There are secondary peaks around the major peaks. I can see that if one atom was replaced by an isotope 1 lighter and another by an isotope 1 heavier then there would be a slight difference introduced due to the variations in binding energy. E.g. Fe56 - Fe54 = -1.99568 and O18 - O16 = 2.00490 so a change of 0.00922 amu would result. There are many such possible variations but most of them that I can see come out to less than 0.01 amu.

However the third peak in the referenced page has two peaks of almost equal size which are 0.058 amu apart (labeled 862.526 and 862.584). I cannot see any way of getting such a huge difference without many substitutions by rare isotopes. In that case there should be multiple other peaks in between that are much more likely and there are not. Also the substitution of many isotopes by rare ones should produce a much smaller peak than that.

I considered molecular configurations as having binding energy also, but it seems to me these would be of the order of volts or less and not 54,000,000 volts as this difference is.

What is going on here?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
The spectrum is of a peptide and therefore only contains C, H, N, O, and S. The mass scale is based on Carbon-12. The other masses relative to this are:

C-13 (13.00335) 1.108% abundant
H-1 (1.007825) 99.984% abundant
H-2 (2.01400) 0.0156% abundant
O-16 (15.99491) 99.759% abundant
O-17 (16.9991) 0.037% abundant
O-18 (17.9992) 0.204% abundant
N-14 (14.00307) 99.635% abundant
N-15 (15.00011) 0.365% abundant
S-32 (31.97207) 95.0% abundant
S-33 (32.97146) 0.76% abundant
S-34 (33.96786) 4.22% abundant
S-36 (35.96709) 0.014% abundant

When you get to masses that are fairly large like this, the combination of non-integer masses and their relative abundances gives you these minor differences.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top